Popular Post
Recent Post

Popular Posts

Monday, May 30, 2011

pics of fat people running

pics of fat people running. Fat People Running Images. fat
  • Fat People Running Images. fat



  • Evoken
    Apr 6, 11:30 PM
    Considering that we haven't had any substantial update since Leopard (as Snow Leopard was more an under the hood thing), which launched 4 years ago, the same year the original iPhone launched; the list of features that are being shown for Lion are downright underwhelming.

    - The Mac App Store
    This is not a part of the OS itself and I can use it right now. This is also hardly an innovation.

    - Launchpad
    This is just a slightly different take on the stacks concept, borrowing from the way it is handled in the iPad.

    - Full-screen apps
    Hmmm....ok...how is this a big deal again?

    - Mission Control
    Just a tweak on the present expose concept. I find it looks a bit cumbersome/clunky.

    - Auto save
    Hmmm....ok...how is this a big deal again?

    - Versions
    Hmmm....ok, useful.

    - Resume
    This one is good.

    - Mail 5
    Now with conversations, something Gmail has had for a long while already.

    - AirDrop
    Interesting but I think not all that different from using Bonjour to transfer files.

    And...that's very much it...

    Don't get me wrong, I am a fan of Apple as much as the next guy but this feature set is hardly impressive. I remember back when Apple released 10.4, I was actually excited about the new features and couldn't wait to update my computer. But now? I feel very much indifferent about Lion, don't see anything innovative or exciting at all, specially when one considers that the last update to include additional features as opposed to under the hood improvements (10.5) was released four years ago.





    pics of fat people running. pics of fat people running.
  • pics of fat people running.



  • iMeowbot
    Sep 25, 01:41 PM
    Adobe is almost getting as bad as Microsoft at delivering software. What's up with Darkroom? It's been in beta for over a year, meanwhile Apple has been steadily improving their product.
    That's a very public beta which has been steadily improved over that time (the last update was yesterday). Unlike Apple, Adobe haven't charged for the beta experience. Amusingly, some of the top new Apple "innovations" are clones of Lightroom features.





    pics of fat people running. Fat People Running Pictures.
  • Fat People Running Pictures.



  • Gugulino
    Mar 31, 04:52 PM
    What kept me often from buying apps was the too complicated paying system: You have to register, give them the number of your credit card, remember the password of the login and so on. The MAS makes this a lot easier and safer. Apple's decision to only allow MAS apps for the Design Award is to push developers to publish their apps on the MAS. What's wrong with that?





    pics of fat people running. Funny Fat People Running.
  • Funny Fat People Running.



  • Corndog5595
    Nov 15, 07:25 PM
    I would be perfectly okay if Infinity Ward spent 10 months on nothing but multiplayer.
    Campaigns are great and all, but the development time they take is not worth the amount of gameplay you get compared to multiplayer.





    pics of fat people running. pics of fat people running.
  • pics of fat people running.



  • Ommid
    Apr 25, 12:21 PM
    Would love a larger screen if they can maintain the same body size. I have no interest in something like the giant PDA-sized Android phones.

    Maybe the phone is smaller and it makes it look like the screen is bigger, food for thought!





    pics of fat people running. Funny Fat People Running.
  • Funny Fat People Running.



  • citizenzen
    Apr 23, 12:44 PM
    Cite?

    Thanks CM.

    I'd gotten tired of asking bassfingers to back up his assertions with evidence.

    His posts are often short-cited.





    pics of fat people running. Funny Fat People Running.
  • Funny Fat People Running.



  • dsnort
    Aug 3, 12:29 PM
    I think that's the idea. The implication I got was that they were going to give Microsoft a generous stretch of rope and let them hang themselves.

    And so, my friends, we see why funny comic strips don't get published widely; instead, we have to live with pablum like "Family Circus" because if it gets any funnier than that, 90% of the population doesn't even come close to getting it.

    You're right, I missed that!!!:eek:

    (Gads, I have GOT to quit drinking while I cruise the forum!!:D )





    pics of fat people running. fat people running pictures.
  • fat people running pictures.



  • Aeolius
    Sep 9, 03:16 PM
    The chart topping hip hop rapper star who used a network hurricane fundraiser to charge "George Bush doesn't care about black people" was loudly and lustily booed during last night's NFL kickoff show.





    pics of fat people running. fat people running pictures.
  • fat people running pictures.



  • dethmaShine
    Apr 11, 08:48 AM
    Also Aero Peek,
    control-tab and windows (command key?)-tab offer some cool ways to swap around active applications.


    Aero Peek is cool.


    MS has done a lot of good work with the UI, in terms of polish and making it look very nice. Apple on the other hand still lacks a complete consistent look and feel. Just look at iTunes and the horizontal traffic lights.


    I don't understand. Microsoft has a more consistent UI than Mac OS X? What are you smoking mate? For everything Windows is better, so why do you use SL?
    As for iTunes, it has got more UI changes than probably any other software on the planet. iTunes is one software that's tweaked and changed and basically used as a reference point. With every single version you see a tweaked UI. That's intentional and not by mistake.

    As for consistent look of the Mac OS, consistent doesn't mean it has to be the same. With respect to FaceTime, the window is all black. That means it is inconsistent, right? No its not.

    The sense of operation and understanding still remains the same; which points to consistency and usability.


    Apple has a long history of implementing UI guidlines and then breaking them in their own apps. OSX itself exhibits this, though with SL, its gotten better.

    As if UI guidelines are a hard and fast rule?
    Apple has always been tweaking certain applications to test other UI's. Even I was corrected the other day when I pointed out that UI guidelines are dead. They are not dead; they are evolving. Take it as a constitution which is amended when required and from time to time.

    The UI guidelines document are not hard and fast rules which cannot be edited or ignored. Twitter and other apps which out rightly ignore the guidelines were accepted, proving that Apple accepts consistency in understanding and operation rather than in visual appearance.





    pics of fat people running. Fat People Running Pictures.
  • Fat People Running Pictures.



  • Drinahn
    Sep 12, 08:04 AM
    or even a blogged feed? i was pretty impressed with macrumor's coverage of the WWDC last month, tho i guess we are not getting similar coverage today :(

    Doubt it. WWDC people can pay to get a seat - it's how it works. This event is a media only invite thing. I suspect that the guys at MacRumors aren't high on Apple's invite list. :-)

    Wow, it's been over a year since I logged in here. o.O





    pics of fat people running. Fat People Running Images.
  • Fat People Running Images.



  • LightSpeed1
    Apr 11, 01:23 AM
    Street Kings

    I think my favorite thing about this movie is it's soundtrack... prob in top 10

    http://img849.imageshack.us/img849/2485/streetkingsbluray.jpgthat movie was pretty good.





    pics of fat people running. Fat People Running Images.
  • Fat People Running Images.



  • shawnce
    Oct 30, 10:21 AM
    The end-fact that Apple's source does not appear to be publicly accessible does not appear to be in dispute, but rather questions have arisen as to whether it was ever publicly accessible (publicly accessible as defined by not requiring registration with Apple. The source is still free).

    Any item released under the APSL (Apple Public Source License) requires and has required since the dawn of the APSL users to register an account with Apple (free account). This is done so Apple can track that you have read the APSL before you gain access to the source. It has always been this way... in fact this registration requirement was talked about on and off for years on the Darwin lists (for example (http://lists.apple.com/archives/darwin-development/2001/Mar/msg00329.html)) and was one of the reasons that OpenDarwin was started (some folks just couldn't bring themselves to register).

    A few years ago Apple integrated the open source account system with their Apple ID system so that if you have an Apple ID you didn't have to create a separate account you could just use that. See last paragraph of this email (http://lists.apple.com/archives/Publicsource-announce/2003/Aug/msg00000.html).

    All Apple Developer Accounts (ADC) can be used as an Apple ID, as can .Mac accounts, Apple support forums accounts, Apple store accounts, etc.

    Finally the 10.4.8 source never got linked on the top level darwin source page, only 10.4.7 got listed most recently (I have been looking for the last 3 weeks). The reason is that Apple is transitioning over to macosforge.org (that is the site that lists links to Intel version of XNU and only that site) and they appeared to have hit some system resource issue that has slowed this transition. As I noted in my prior post you can access 10.4.8 sources using a direct link to the tarball.

    As a side note I have worked on Darwin sources since it was first put online under the APSL and I worked on aspects of OpenDarwin when it first got going. So I am speaking from a long history of experience with Darwin.





    pics of fat people running. fat people running pictures.
  • fat people running pictures.



  • Branskins
    Apr 15, 08:31 PM
    I really want this!





    pics of fat people running. pics of fat people running.
  • pics of fat people running.



  • iansilv
    Apr 15, 01:39 PM
    LOL at the perspective on the text in the 3rd photo. :D

    FAKE.

    Oh- yeah- you're right. I see that now- yeah I agree it's fake. I still like it though.





    pics of fat people running. Pictures Of Fat People Running
  • Pictures Of Fat People Running



  • Performa
    Sep 25, 12:51 PM
    Because they didn't announce MacBook Pro's with Core 2 Duo! Why else?



    I guess if they announced in the news that a cure had been found for cancer, these people would say, "So! Where is my new MacBook Pro?"

    You "One-Way, ______er ________ers."





    pics of fat people running. Fat People Running Pictures.
  • Fat People Running Pictures.



  • tvachon
    Jan 9, 02:20 PM
    Yeah. Well, at least now I don't feel scared to refresh the page looking for the updated link. Is there anyone that can be contacted to take that off?

    I caught that this morning, used pithhelmet to hide it for now. But now of course, I cant find the regex which did it for all of you.





    pics of fat people running. Fat People Running Images. fat
  • Fat People Running Images. fat



  • SilentPanda
    Apr 21, 11:46 AM
    In other words, there is no allowance for apathy. I can't be arsed with a system that doesn't allow for apathy. **** that.

    Apathy would be not clicking anything.





    pics of fat people running. learn about running for fat
  • learn about running for fat



  • iliketomac
    Jan 15, 01:20 PM
    Yes I agree. The MBAir is attractive but short on some features for its hefty price. A few hundred dollars less, then it would be a good deal, IMO. But eventually the specs will get better and better for either the same price point or reduced price points over the course of time... Also, it looks like no Apple Remote and Front Row for the MBAir??





    pics of fat people running. Fat People Cause Cartooning
  • Fat People Cause Cartooning



  • fblack
    Nov 16, 07:57 PM
    They may have some AMD's in a lab in some basement "just in case", but I would be totally blown away if they came out w/anything at this time.

    If I remember correctly (and if not Im sure someone will correct me) the big incentive to go to intel, besides cooler chips, was intel money. Intel sharing costs of marketing that goes along with exclusive contracts and the "Intel inside" campaign (thankfully no stickers on macs).

    The other reason is just marketshare. Apple's limited number of models works with its marketshare size. Increasing the number of board design would probably incur higher costs at this time, at least from having to provide support for 2 different designs. I doubt Apple wants a MacBook Intel and MacBook AMD at this time. It might at a future date with more marketshare.

    Another possibility against an AMD Mac is the confusion that might occur in marketing. The message right now is clear: pwerful dual core intel chips and elegant people friendly designed apple software. Why throw, oh also AMD into the mix?





    pdjudd
    May 2, 11:54 AM
    "Bugs". That's so funny. Like it wasn't something indented by Big Brother, make that Apple. We truly do have a new evil empire now.
    I presume you have hard proof of this unfounded claim I hope.





    SeaFox
    Oct 28, 11:23 PM
    A) It's not the OSS community that's trying to crack Apple's DRM. Lets get that straight. These people have nothing to do with that community. These guys are just pirates using the source that is out there.


    That's true. But they are the ones who are going bellyache continually about Apple not having the software available anymore. "Why can't I get the Darwin source code?" "This is unfair, they used BSD stuff and now they aren't sharing!" "Why haven't they released 10.4.9?" (when it comes out)

    They aren't going to look at it from Apple's perspective. They aren't going to say. "Well, gee thanks Apple for trying to share the software with us. We're sorry you're getting screwed over by Wintel hackers who are too cheap to just buy a Mac." They're going too say. Well, we're sorry that's happening but you have to just put up with it as part of having your stuff available. They'll make Apple out to be evil when this is all a reactionary measure. Apple wants to release Darwin as open source, otherwise they could have just released the first version and then closed the source after that (they can legally do that, just because it was open source and you released it once doesn't mean you have to keep doing it). Apple would never be able to use any newer BSD components after that, they would begin maintaining their software as a fork pretty much. They only pulled it because someone keeps hacking to run it on plain beige box Wintels. And the OSS people aren't going to look at those hackers as the ones responsible for the source being pulled.

    Many OSS people are the free as in speech types, but I feel most are a combination of the free as in speech and as in beer types. They wants software to be free for use and they don't think it should have a pricetag attached. These are the ones always saying Apple should have to release Aqua too just because the Darwin part of OSX is released.


    Edit:
    Oh ****! Thanks Apple! Now, how am I supposed to get Mac OS X to run on my old Linux box?

    See? There they are now. "Oh, ****! Thanks Apple!" Who's fault is it the source was pulled again?





    Chundles
    Sep 12, 02:47 AM
    Does anyone know what time this even will be in GMT?

    10am Cupertino (west coast US) time. Just over 9 hours to go.





    Machead III
    Sep 12, 03:58 AM
    6 (SIX) PM UK time :)

    I thought it was 5pm?





    spencers
    Apr 10, 02:40 PM
    http://img.runningwarehouse.com/big/SFT5M1-2.jpg

    Nice, Fastwitch? Thought about trying those at some point.

    Samsung PN50C8000 x3.

    Continuing to build my ultimate theater room - just need to paint the in wall speakers that were installed.
    Sweet!



    No comments:

    Post a Comment