FinalGC
02-24 09:08 AM
My wife is studying for Nursing and hence I know the anser. Either General Nursing or BSN will allow you to give the RN exam. However, before that have your crendtials evaluated by www.wes.org, so that an US equivalency is established. Based on that you can apply for the RN exam.
General Nursing is equivalent to an Associate in Nursing. For future promitions, BSN is better.
General Nursing is equivalent to an Associate in Nursing. For future promitions, BSN is better.
wallpaper Emma Watson is a better model
shreekarthik
07-01 07:25 PM
I had expected some kind of outlook from the recent AILA - DoS liaison that happened in San Antonio. Both Matthew Oh and Sheela Murthy did not report any outlook. But here's an outlook from another lawyer
http://www.gtlaw.com/practices/immi.../2006/06/27.htm
Immigration News Flash
June 27, 2006
Further Retrogression for Employment-Based Immigrant Visas Anticipated
At a recent immigration conference in San Antonio, it was reported that the Department of State ("DOS") expects that the EB1 China category will remain current and the EB2 China category to continue advancing. On a less positive note, further delays in the EB1 and EB2 categories for Indian nationals is expected as well as the EB3 category for all nationalities. With the Department of Labor's optimistic projection that the the Backlog Elimination Centers will meet their goal of eliminating its backlog and processing the remaining labor certifications filed pre-PERM implementation by September 2007, the DOS expects severe retrogression in many of the categories, particularly the EB3 categories - across the board. While this report is pure speculation, it does spark concern that applicants will be facing further delays in the permanent residence process. The DOS' Visa Bulletin is released on a monthly basis at http://travel.state.gov/visa/frvi/b...letin_1770.html. Greenberg Traurig will continue to monitor this issue and provide further updates as soon as they are available.
Looks like it's a long haul for EB3 in general and could be punishing for EB3-IND and EB2-IND.
This is the effect of increasing the H1B quota to 115,000 for 2 years and then to 195000 in 1 year without actually increasing the GC quota.
Good luck to all of us. Those who are in late 2001 and early 2002 EB3-IND filers can hope to get relief in the next year or so but unless some bill passes other EB3-IND filers should possibly work towards Plan B. Also read the report by USCIS ombudsman. It's quite revealing about the working of USCIS. This country might be technologically advanced but it's bureaucracy seems to be much worse than third world countries comparitively.
http://www.gtlaw.com/practices/immi.../2006/06/27.htm
Immigration News Flash
June 27, 2006
Further Retrogression for Employment-Based Immigrant Visas Anticipated
At a recent immigration conference in San Antonio, it was reported that the Department of State ("DOS") expects that the EB1 China category will remain current and the EB2 China category to continue advancing. On a less positive note, further delays in the EB1 and EB2 categories for Indian nationals is expected as well as the EB3 category for all nationalities. With the Department of Labor's optimistic projection that the the Backlog Elimination Centers will meet their goal of eliminating its backlog and processing the remaining labor certifications filed pre-PERM implementation by September 2007, the DOS expects severe retrogression in many of the categories, particularly the EB3 categories - across the board. While this report is pure speculation, it does spark concern that applicants will be facing further delays in the permanent residence process. The DOS' Visa Bulletin is released on a monthly basis at http://travel.state.gov/visa/frvi/b...letin_1770.html. Greenberg Traurig will continue to monitor this issue and provide further updates as soon as they are available.
Looks like it's a long haul for EB3 in general and could be punishing for EB3-IND and EB2-IND.
This is the effect of increasing the H1B quota to 115,000 for 2 years and then to 195000 in 1 year without actually increasing the GC quota.
Good luck to all of us. Those who are in late 2001 and early 2002 EB3-IND filers can hope to get relief in the next year or so but unless some bill passes other EB3-IND filers should possibly work towards Plan B. Also read the report by USCIS ombudsman. It's quite revealing about the working of USCIS. This country might be technologically advanced but it's bureaucracy seems to be much worse than third world countries comparitively.
kmk2002
02-09 11:27 AM
Check public data at
http://flcdatacenter.com/CaseData.aspx
Here's the site: http://www.myvisajobs.com/H1BVisa/Default.htm
http://flcdatacenter.com/CaseData.aspx
Here's the site: http://www.myvisajobs.com/H1BVisa/Default.htm
2011 Emma Watson Modelling Rumours,
harikris
01-29 10:05 AM
Hi,
I don't know the statistics or aware of the source for the same.
But based on the most recently published Visa Bulletin, if you are from India, the cut-off date for FB2 is 22 Jan 2005. If you are not from India, then please look up the Visa Bulletin at Visa Bulletin for February 2010 (http://www.travel.state.gov/visa/frvi/bulletin/bulletin_4611.html).
It might take 2 to 3 months for your priority date to become current if you are an Indian Citizen [or chargeable to India].
HTH.
I don't know the statistics or aware of the source for the same.
But based on the most recently published Visa Bulletin, if you are from India, the cut-off date for FB2 is 22 Jan 2005. If you are not from India, then please look up the Visa Bulletin at Visa Bulletin for February 2010 (http://www.travel.state.gov/visa/frvi/bulletin/bulletin_4611.html).
It might take 2 to 3 months for your priority date to become current if you are an Indian Citizen [or chargeable to India].
HTH.
more...
masti_Gai
01-19 03:55 PM
For EB2 & EB3 category people it is the Date on which Labor was filed.:)
For EB1 category people it is the Date on which I-140 was filed.:)
For EB1 category people it is the Date on which I-140 was filed.:)
tabletpc
12-01 11:35 AM
Sorry to know u r situation. But remember not knowing rules is not an execuse with USCICS.
1.Is it possible to do H1 transfer with one paystub if I somehow manage to get one from them(By lyin as in for bank loan)?
When you apply for trasnfer you need 2-3 recent pay stubs. Pay stubs are asked to show you are indeed working and not out of status.
2. Would I get any query on that? But one good explanation is I finished my MBs around the same time as I applied H1 and so I can explain it to USCIS but still I'm worried. Any body in smilar boat?
Usually transfer is easy when compared to getting first time h1B. However considering you qualification its difficult to say. However you can still get sufficient documents and try for an transfer. If you get RFE , you can then decide weather to gohead with transfer or not.
USCICS receive thoudands of application and i am sure they won't be willing to listen to your story.
My 2 cents...its illigal not to give pay stubs to employee. learn the rules from DOL website and you threaten the employer. I am sure employer he will bend as he will have to close the consultant if you report to USCICS about the this.
Good luck
1.Is it possible to do H1 transfer with one paystub if I somehow manage to get one from them(By lyin as in for bank loan)?
When you apply for trasnfer you need 2-3 recent pay stubs. Pay stubs are asked to show you are indeed working and not out of status.
2. Would I get any query on that? But one good explanation is I finished my MBs around the same time as I applied H1 and so I can explain it to USCIS but still I'm worried. Any body in smilar boat?
Usually transfer is easy when compared to getting first time h1B. However considering you qualification its difficult to say. However you can still get sufficient documents and try for an transfer. If you get RFE , you can then decide weather to gohead with transfer or not.
USCICS receive thoudands of application and i am sure they won't be willing to listen to your story.
My 2 cents...its illigal not to give pay stubs to employee. learn the rules from DOL website and you threaten the employer. I am sure employer he will bend as he will have to close the consultant if you report to USCICS about the this.
Good luck
more...
akizdetz
08-10 04:03 PM
I have just received the following email:
*** DO NOT RESPOND TO THIS E-MAIL ***
The last processing action taken on your case
Receipt Number: SRCxxxxxxxxxx
Application Type: I485 , APPLICATION TO REGISTER PERMANENT RESIDENCE OR TO ADJUST STATUS
Your Case Status: Card/ Document Production
On August 9, 2010 we mailed the document to the address we have on file. You should receive the new document within 30 days. If you do not, or if you move before you get it, call customer service at 1-800-375-5283.
Does this mean that I-140 was also approved? I'm looking online and it's says "Initial Review"... Actually this is the only one that have changed, all other documents for both me and my wife are still at the previous LUD!
P. S. This looks and sounds weird for me, especially that I have the biometrics appointment on 09/02/2010. I think it's a mistake... Please advise!
*** DO NOT RESPOND TO THIS E-MAIL ***
The last processing action taken on your case
Receipt Number: SRCxxxxxxxxxx
Application Type: I485 , APPLICATION TO REGISTER PERMANENT RESIDENCE OR TO ADJUST STATUS
Your Case Status: Card/ Document Production
On August 9, 2010 we mailed the document to the address we have on file. You should receive the new document within 30 days. If you do not, or if you move before you get it, call customer service at 1-800-375-5283.
Does this mean that I-140 was also approved? I'm looking online and it's says "Initial Review"... Actually this is the only one that have changed, all other documents for both me and my wife are still at the previous LUD!
P. S. This looks and sounds weird for me, especially that I have the biometrics appointment on 09/02/2010. I think it's a mistake... Please advise!
2010 Emma Watson, sensuality and
.jpg "emma watson funny")
cheers1234
06-15 08:22 AM
Sorry for the confusion. i am not deported. One of my company's new employee was deported at POE. Yes. POE did called my employer and asked where he is going to work. My employer said he is going to work on our company site. Then the officer said your empoyee told us that he is going to work at client site. Then the officer said he will call back.
Officer called back after 30min and told my employer that your emplyee submitted some fraud document. And then my employer said i am not liable what he did and explined the officer that he was doing bussinees more than 8 years and have all the proper documents.
Then the officer said he understand the situation and said he is just doing duty. Officer said he is going to send a report to DOL.
Officer called back after 30min and told my employer that your emplyee submitted some fraud document. And then my employer said i am not liable what he did and explined the officer that he was doing bussinees more than 8 years and have all the proper documents.
Then the officer said he understand the situation and said he is just doing duty. Officer said he is going to send a report to DOL.
more...
Alex1411
07-05 01:26 AM
Your questions are valid....but either way, you must enter US ASAP on your AP (or have someone mail ytou your GC). The issue is that you are NOT totally free once you get GC because immediately leaving your sponsoring employer is a no-no and can cause your GC to be revoked or be an issue at the time of citizenship. It is advisable to stick to the employer for 6mts to 1 year after GC - if the employer is still functioning. Also, USCIS has increased employment place visits for recent GC approvals. :)
Thanks for your answer!^^
Thanks for your answer!^^
hair (Emma Watson)
morchu
05-24 01:25 AM
SSN is not really a requirement to start to work. So the answer to your question is NO, she dont need SSN to work on EAD.
But in a practical scenario she need an SSN to work (see below reasons).
SSN is required to pay/withhold taxes and probably for pre-employment background checks and all. So it is very unlikely that an employer will hire somebody without an SSN (or at-least applied for SSN).
Does she need SSN to work on EAD?
But in a practical scenario she need an SSN to work (see below reasons).
SSN is required to pay/withhold taxes and probably for pre-employment background checks and all. So it is very unlikely that an employer will hire somebody without an SSN (or at-least applied for SSN).
Does she need SSN to work on EAD?
more...
irukandji
05-09 12:18 PM
Today I talked to Lvl-2 officer and he said that they are upgrading the online system and the status check should be back by end of this month(May)...Not sure if he's just covering up..
hot Emma Watson Demi Finland July
punjabi
06-25 03:05 PM
Hi,
Can you please mention the source also (example, the website) from where you copied this content?
Thanks.
For members doing the Calculations..............
According to DHS | CIS Ombudsman Updates:
During FY 2009 and FY 2010, usage of family-based visas has been exceptionally low, especially among spouses and children of green card holders (the F-2
...
...
...again go unused in FY 2010.
Can you please mention the source also (example, the website) from where you copied this content?
Thanks.
For members doing the Calculations..............
According to DHS | CIS Ombudsman Updates:
During FY 2009 and FY 2010, usage of family-based visas has been exceptionally low, especially among spouses and children of green card holders (the F-2
...
...
...again go unused in FY 2010.
more...
house Emma Watson#39; Beautiful Photos
poorslumdog
05-03 11:56 PM
Guru's pl help..
One of friends 485(primary) was pending and his wife's 485(derivative) also pending.
Both of them are on H1(different employers) and they both lay-off around the same time about 4 months ago. My friends employer has been running paychecks for him but his wife's employer canceled her H1.
Is she now on "AOS" status or out-of-status?
Is she has to file H4 as my friend's dependent?
Thanks in advance..
I hope experience people will guide you on this. In the mean time why dont you ask your friend to join and ask the question.
One of friends 485(primary) was pending and his wife's 485(derivative) also pending.
Both of them are on H1(different employers) and they both lay-off around the same time about 4 months ago. My friends employer has been running paychecks for him but his wife's employer canceled her H1.
Is she now on "AOS" status or out-of-status?
Is she has to file H4 as my friend's dependent?
Thanks in advance..
I hope experience people will guide you on this. In the mean time why dont you ask your friend to join and ask the question.
tattoo V³ Magazine: Emma Watson is
wandmaker
11-01 08:21 PM
Hi, I wanted to know if it is possible for me to maintain my H1 status (and my wife's H4) status while re-entering the US using I-131 Advance Parole document without a valid H1 visa stamp in my passport.
Here's my situation: -
1. I have been on H1 status for the past 6+ years.
2. My current employer filed for an H1 renewal/extension petition for years 7-9 which has been approved and we have the approval notice.
3. My wife's H4 renewal petition has also been approved.
4. We both have filed for I-485 Adjustment of Status which is pending with USCIS due to retrogression.
5. Our H1 & H4 visa stamps in the passport expired in September of 2009.
6. We are planning to leave the US for about a month in Nov-Dec and do have valid I-131 documents for purposes of re-entering.
At the port of entry, can we show our H1/H4 approval notices to the IO and request that he stamp our new I-94s for a H1/H4 status?
Thanks
Showing H1/H4 notice will lead to confusion and @POE, officer will not issue I-94 per H1/H4 notices. Rather, you show your AP and re-enter the country, and your I-94 will be issued as Parolee w/ the validity of 1 year. You can still work for your H1B employer in H1 status and continue to renew when it expires. My 2 cents.
Here's my situation: -
1. I have been on H1 status for the past 6+ years.
2. My current employer filed for an H1 renewal/extension petition for years 7-9 which has been approved and we have the approval notice.
3. My wife's H4 renewal petition has also been approved.
4. We both have filed for I-485 Adjustment of Status which is pending with USCIS due to retrogression.
5. Our H1 & H4 visa stamps in the passport expired in September of 2009.
6. We are planning to leave the US for about a month in Nov-Dec and do have valid I-131 documents for purposes of re-entering.
At the port of entry, can we show our H1/H4 approval notices to the IO and request that he stamp our new I-94s for a H1/H4 status?
Thanks
Showing H1/H4 notice will lead to confusion and @POE, officer will not issue I-94 per H1/H4 notices. Rather, you show your AP and re-enter the country, and your I-94 will be issued as Parolee w/ the validity of 1 year. You can still work for your H1B employer in H1 status and continue to renew when it expires. My 2 cents.
more...
pictures Emma Watson Modeling Jeans
dvb123
06-01 10:43 PM
We are in an era of US Immigration where a Fashion model work permit bill would have a better chance of clearing the house than a highly skilled immigrants bill.
05/09/2008: Fashion Model P-4 Visa Classification Bill, H.R.4080 Approved by House Judiciary Immigration Subcommittee 05/08/2008
As we reported yesterday, the subcommittee debated this bill and approved this bill for the full Judiciary Committee action of the House yesterday. A small positive news on the immigration legislation!
http://www.immigration-law.com/
The OPT 17 month extension rule ran into problems barely a month after it was introduced. The anti-immigrant groups constantly send faxes, emails and snail mail constantly to stop immigrant bills from passing. This frightens the senators and house representatives because they think that majority of United States citizens are agains't immigrant bills while an average United States citizen does not the know the difference between green card and H1 B clearly, leave alone opposing highly skilled immigrant bills.
USCIS makes tons of mistakes but it will try to repeal mistakes if it believes that it has made an error. The CSPA new regulations is an example of USCIS accepting and rectifying its mistakes.
http://www.murthy.com/news/n_revcsp.html
The AC21 act gave an additional visa number pool of approx 130,000 visa numbers which were actually unused EB visa numbers from 1999 and 2000. This is a reserve visa pool that could be used for future fiscal years. HOW CAN A RESERVE POOL BE USED WHEN THERE WERE UNUSED VISA NUMBERS FROM 2000 TO 2005?
http://www.nafsa.org/regulatory_information.sec/regulatory_document_library.dlib/u.s._immigration_system_2/ac21_-_the_american_competitiveness
The solution to our saga is to count the immigrant visa numbers from DHS statistics files of EB visas distribution for each year from 2000 to 2005.If we are unable to get all the information required from DHS statistics files we can put FOIA requests and get the information. Instead of making USCIS doing an audit we can do the audit ourselves and inform USCIS that there are still immigrant visa numbers left from the AC21 act. The good thing about this reserve visa numbers is that they can be rolled over to the the future years. So we can get them issued for the years 2008 and 2009.
I think this is the only solution to our saga.
05/09/2008: Fashion Model P-4 Visa Classification Bill, H.R.4080 Approved by House Judiciary Immigration Subcommittee 05/08/2008
As we reported yesterday, the subcommittee debated this bill and approved this bill for the full Judiciary Committee action of the House yesterday. A small positive news on the immigration legislation!
http://www.immigration-law.com/
The OPT 17 month extension rule ran into problems barely a month after it was introduced. The anti-immigrant groups constantly send faxes, emails and snail mail constantly to stop immigrant bills from passing. This frightens the senators and house representatives because they think that majority of United States citizens are agains't immigrant bills while an average United States citizen does not the know the difference between green card and H1 B clearly, leave alone opposing highly skilled immigrant bills.
USCIS makes tons of mistakes but it will try to repeal mistakes if it believes that it has made an error. The CSPA new regulations is an example of USCIS accepting and rectifying its mistakes.
http://www.murthy.com/news/n_revcsp.html
The AC21 act gave an additional visa number pool of approx 130,000 visa numbers which were actually unused EB visa numbers from 1999 and 2000. This is a reserve visa pool that could be used for future fiscal years. HOW CAN A RESERVE POOL BE USED WHEN THERE WERE UNUSED VISA NUMBERS FROM 2000 TO 2005?
http://www.nafsa.org/regulatory_information.sec/regulatory_document_library.dlib/u.s._immigration_system_2/ac21_-_the_american_competitiveness
The solution to our saga is to count the immigrant visa numbers from DHS statistics files of EB visas distribution for each year from 2000 to 2005.If we are unable to get all the information required from DHS statistics files we can put FOIA requests and get the information. Instead of making USCIS doing an audit we can do the audit ourselves and inform USCIS that there are still immigrant visa numbers left from the AC21 act. The good thing about this reserve visa numbers is that they can be rolled over to the the future years. So we can get them issued for the years 2008 and 2009.
I think this is the only solution to our saga.
dresses Hermione Granger Emma Watson
pappu
03-10 10:42 AM
Any body has a soft LUD on approved EAD while I 485 pending.
Soft LUD ????
It just shows how much some of us are in the dark with misinformation from forums.
Soft LUD ????
It just shows how much some of us are in the dark with misinformation from forums.
more...
makeup Watson dating model Emma
vijaysammeta
03-21 09:09 AM
How did you get to the confirmation page without the photograph being uploaded. I cannot seem to get past the photopage and it keeps throwing an application error. Which website are you using to fill in teh DS160? Thanks for a response.
girlfriend Emma Watson shows off her
pappu
01-01 06:31 PM
IV has been featured in India Post newspaper.
http://immigrationvoice.org/forum/showthread.php?p=40338#post40338
Could someone send me the scanned copy of the article? I would post it on the site for everyone to see and also record it for our purposes.
himanshu at immigrationvoice.org
thanks
http://immigrationvoice.org/forum/showthread.php?p=40338#post40338
Could someone send me the scanned copy of the article? I would post it on the site for everyone to see and also record it for our purposes.
himanshu at immigrationvoice.org
thanks
hairstyles Affair: Emma Watson amp; Her
[uber]
04-09 05:26 AM
i see em... but i'm having trouble with DNS for some stupid reason...
here's the upload
here's the upload
vegaspd
06-01 06:03 PM
I received a notice from uscis
"USCIS will use the priority date that must benefits the applicant, your request has been sent to your file"
Anybody has any idea what this means.
Thank you all
Vegaspd
"USCIS will use the priority date that must benefits the applicant, your request has been sent to your file"
Anybody has any idea what this means.
Thank you all
Vegaspd
adhantari
06-16 03:26 PM
6 to 1...... maybe L1 guys don't visit this forum since they already got thier GCs....:rolleyes:
H1 loosers still hanging here.....
H1 loosers still hanging here.....
No comments:
Post a Comment