Popular Post
Recent Post

Popular Posts

Wednesday, June 15, 2011

1971 Pontiac Lemans Sport

images Lot: 1012-1972 LEMANS SPORT 1971 Pontiac Lemans Sport. A 1971 Pontiac LeMans Sport
  • A 1971 Pontiac LeMans Sport



  • gbof
    02-26 02:47 PM
    Hello,
    I came here as F1 visa but I'm out of stutus now. Here is some background:
    I came here in september 2006 as F1 visa. I took 2 english quaters at the university then tranfer to another school in april 2007 ( Let calls them MSU). MSU gave me I 20 and it expried on March 2010. But due to financial problem, I did not register class at MSU after april 2007 so I was out of status. After that, I started register class at MSU in september 2008 and stoped in april 2009. I did not register any class after april 2009. I talked to my advicesor and she said, since I have been in school on and off so no matter that i went back to school some, I still out of stutus.

    I have been my boyfriend for almost 3 years now and we want to get married ( He is an US citizen). I really dont know if i will get trouble because of my stutus or where to start? like what files do we have to fill, etc....
    Any advice would be appreciate! Thank you so much for your time!

    Both desi3933 and deechi are right.
    on the side: You intend doing a course in English (may be to do a job). Your english tells all you care for english. You sure need to improve your english... even in an informal set up





    wallpaper A 1971 Pontiac LeMans Sport 1971 Pontiac Lemans Sport. 1970 Pontiac LeMans Sport
  • 1970 Pontiac LeMans Sport



  • 485Mbe4001
    12-17 06:20 PM
    Look at the EB3 dates for Mexico for the last 4-6 months, they were all beyond april 2001 and still stuck for 4 months with little movement. Most people think that April 2001 sounds like a beacon of hope or a major hurdle after which things will be normal and we will start getting the GCs, i dont know how you can say EB3 moved fast, and for desis its a long long wait.


    Now the biggest hurdle of Apr 30, 2001 is crossed. I am sure that not many people has filed between Sep 2001 and February 2002. Also if you look into PD for China and Phillipines, the dates moved very fast after June 2001. Lot of people applied in late 2002 and early 2003. My guess would be that it will take about 3 to 4 years to clear all the backlogs of 2003. For 2004 it may be over 5 years.





    1971 Pontiac Lemans Sport. 1971 Pontiac LeMans Sport
  • 1971 Pontiac LeMans Sport



  • thamizhan
    07-17 10:29 PM
    This is like giving them a small window to file within 10 days in the old rate other wise....pay the big chunk.

    Good tactics....it will be difficult for the people who do not have any medical appointments and other documents that need to come from other countries !!





    2011 1970 Pontiac LeMans Sport 1971 Pontiac Lemans Sport. 1971 Pontiac Lemans Sport
  • 1971 Pontiac Lemans Sport



  • eb3retro
    06-09 08:37 AM
    Hi all,

    I have come to texas on a B1 to the client location. I stayed with my colleague who has a apartment here. When we left to office ( my first day ) .I made a mistake leaving my passport and others in apartment. .

    I have applied and got a new passport .

    I have applied for I-94 by filing I-102 . The processing dates are very slow for this . I only have a reciept of this and nothing.

    I am leaving 3july next month...what need to be done....i dont even have a VISA.

    And what needs to be done for B1 VISA.

    I emailed the chennai US embassy but couldnt get any reply............



    PLEAASE...HELP:(:confused:

    is this in dallas or houston?



    more...


    1971 Pontiac Lemans Sport. 1971 Pontiac Lemans Front
  • 1971 Pontiac Lemans Front



  • gcnirvana
    06-15 12:43 AM
    Gurus,
    My employer advises me to be on H1B because of the uncertainity that comes with EAD. But I told him that my wife needs an EAD so that she can work. He said she can get one and I can be on H1. Is it possible? Also, I think I shud also get an EAD so that I am free to move around. But I don't wanna be blunt on the face and blow it all up. How would I make him understand/persuade and make him file my EAD and AP?

    As always, appreciate all your help :)





    1971 Pontiac Lemans Sport. LeMans
  • LeMans



  • ita
    01-23 08:30 PM
    Suggestions.

    1 Since the main reason behind the retrogression is the lack of Visa numbers I feel it would be a great idea to process the 485 applications , make a decision on the case and let the applicant know about the decision though the actual card can be mailed when the Visa Numbers become available . This would reduce the anxiety on behalf of the applicants and would also give USCIS ample time to process all the applications.

    2. Yearly extension of EAD/AP is getting so expensive especially when one doesn't know how many years we have to keep doing the extensions.
    It's a known fact that except for the July 07 bulletin EB3 India PD has hardly touched year 2002 since Dec 2004.

    Some of the EB3 I folks with a 2005 PD, that I know have been issued one year extension on their EAD though they applied for the extensions in mid July(2008).

    Example of EAD/AP anxiety:

    AP document says that it should be used for emergency travel. This rule on AP
    was formed at a time when 485 processing would take not more than 6 months.
    In the present scenario with 485 processing taking years I think a person using EAD would end up using AP many times . Officers at the POE sometimes remind us the rule that AP should be used only in emergency and some of them give the person hard time if they believe the travel was not for emergency purpose.
    I guess we are supposed to have a proof of emergency travel.

    Though AC21 lets one change jobs 180 days after filing the 485 application with the I40 approved for more than 180 days when reentering the country some of the officer(s) sometimes ask the person if they are still with the same company that filed their GC.I don't know yet what they would do/say if one had changed their jobs because the people who were asked this question did not change their employer at that time. But the fact that they ask us this question makes us apprehensive about changing jobs.
    With so many rules where most of them were formed long back it's making applicant's life increasingly tough as the applicants themselves don't want to do anything that would be construed/fall on the wrong side of the rules.We are forced to watch our steps multiple times even in the case of simple things like job changes,travelout of country etc.

    When I repeatedly read about how USICS is inundated with 485 applications due to July 2007 bulletin I keep wondering why USCIS would want to increase it's work load every year with all these EAD/AP renewal applications.

    Suggestion
    Once upon a time when the 485 processing took like 6 months, EAD/AP had different meaning. In the present scenario when not many of us know how many more yeras it's going to be before (especially EB3 I folks) we get our GreenCard I would think it would be better to use the pending 485 application to change jobs and reenter the country.
    This would save money/time for the applicant and lot of time for USICS.

    Thank you.



    more...


    1971 Pontiac Lemans Sport. 1973 Pontiac Le Mans picture
  • 1973 Pontiac Le Mans picture



  • glus
    11-06 09:06 AM
    Hi

    I my PD is July 2003 EB3 (India).

    My I140 was approved in 2006 and had applied for 485, EAD, A/P in July 2007 like most of you. Yesterday LUD on my approved I140 and 485, EAD, A/P applications in USCIS changed after months. But now my approved I140 status has changed to
    What is even more surprising is that it also says This is incorrect since i got the approval notice in Nov 2006.

    I have NOT done any labor substitution or anything like that.

    As usually our corporate lawyer and HR were useless and think this is just some system issue at USCIS. Did anyone else see this before? I was looking for other threads but couldn't find anyone else having similar issues.

    Immigration gurus - any suggestions/comments? Is this normal?

    Thanks!

    Hi PSN,
    Please do not worry. I have seen this happening with one of my friend's I-130. Although a different application, his status suddenly changed to "pending" from approved years ago. He took infopass and they told him it was a system glitch. A few days later after infopass his status reversed back to "approved." I would take info pass, along with approval notice and just explain the situation. Do not worry until you know the reason. Also, do not think it is some kind of an investigation. When USCIS does investigations on approved cases, the status shows "Case re-opened". Let us know what they told you after infopass.





    2010 1971 Pontiac LeMans Sport 1971 Pontiac Lemans Sport. Lot: 1012-1972 LEMANS SPORT
  • Lot: 1012-1972 LEMANS SPORT



  • manand24
    10-15 02:13 PM
    Well put logiclife....

    LuDs are trivial. Sometimes there are LuDs on cases for no apparent reason.

    I have had LuDs on my approved 140 even when there was nothing to begin with. Nothing pending since 140, no 485, no H1 extension. Even then there was LuD on 140.

    No one really knows what LUD really indicates. Because there is really no pattern in LUDs on cases. NONE.

    Rather than asking other blind men to lead you, why dont you take it upon yourself and find out for once and for all.

    Let's say LUDs, or lack thereof are bothering you so much that you are losing sleep over it. You are trying to connect dots over LUD, fingerprinting and EAD etc. If you really want something so badly, why dont you stand up and fight for it and ask for it. I am not asking you to help IV or contribute funds or join state chapters. If you dont want to join state chapters, then dont. But atleast, for your own good, if something bothers you so much, then do something for yourself. Get an appt with ASC and find out what LUD means. Fly to Washington DC, go to directors of operations at USCIS headquarters and ask them what LUD means and why isnt there more transparency in online status. Why do we have to connect dots with LUDS and whey cant there by step-by-step update of each petition. GO AND FIGHT FOR YOURSELF.

    Sitting here and asking other people, who dont know anything more than you do, is the same thing as one blind man asking another blind man to cross the street because the blind man is too lazy and to shy to ask someone with eyesight for a favor.

    Again, I am not doing this to goad you into state chapter or funds. Or joining IV. Dont want to do what IV asks, then dont. But atleast do something FOR YOURSELF. Drive to DC, sit in USCIS HQ and ask them for something better than LUDs.



    more...


    1971 Pontiac Lemans Sport. former glory. Ryan
  • former glory. Ryan



  • nozerd
    02-08 11:12 AM
    Does anyone know if Transit visa is needed while travelling with Air India via London.
    Asking since you dont change planes in London... you continue on same flight.





    hair 1971 Pontiac Lemans Sport 1971 Pontiac Lemans Sport. My 1971 Pontiac LeMans Sport
  • My 1971 Pontiac LeMans Sport



  • eb3retro
    08-08 07:33 PM
    ^^^^^



    more...


    1971 Pontiac Lemans Sport. 1971 Pontiac Lemans Sport
  • 1971 Pontiac Lemans Sport



  • Dhundhun
    07-10 06:30 PM
    On I-797 from Y it doesn't have I-94 number on it anywhere. since its through consular processing.
    In order to work with Y, i have to get stamped first then only pay stubbs are generated. This was the understanding, when owner of Y ,company Y Attorney and myself were in the conference call discussion.


    Basically the H-1B with company Y required Change of Status (COS). I am not familiar with this type of situation - whether you can get change of status done in USA or not. If not I think this is a case, which requires Visa to be stamped in home country.

    Could somebody throw more infromation on this? Thanks





    hot 1971 Pontiac Lemans Front 1971 Pontiac Lemans Sport. Pontiac LeMans
  • Pontiac LeMans



  • Blog Feeds
    09-18 10:20 AM
    AILA Leadership Has Just Posted the Following:


    https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEhII257nqArTBmUHpuwJ2oj0tO-rQw_iAgaAm5OG7TvwbBDjUNw6__oeLNEI8tb8ECyNQvGoH0TDn04wuZw4LUCWRSvsEecRrELY12gDaS4saihyjjM3B04vlFAU5XVlvToRvUYgdxujkQ/s320/Wilson+Liar.jpg (https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEhII257nqArTBmUHpuwJ2oj0tO-rQw_iAgaAm5OG7TvwbBDjUNw6__oeLNEI8tb8ECyNQvGoH0TDn04wuZw4LUCWRSvsEecRrELY12gDaS4saihyjjM3B04vlFAU5XVlvToRvUYgdxujkQ/s1600-h/Wilson+Liar.jpg)During President Obama's address to a joint session of Congress on Tuesday, Congressman Joe Wilson (R. SC), shouted "LIAR!" when President Obama stated that the proposed health care plan would not cover "illegal aliens." Now, Joe Wilson said he should know this because he once was an immigration lawyer (http://www.riehlworldview.com/carnivorous_conservative/2009/09/rep-joe-wilson-speaks-to-rwv.html). Whether that meant immigration from or to South Carolina, I am not sure, but one thing is for sure, no one I know ever knew Joe Wilson the immigration lawyer. If by "immigration lawyer" Mr. Wilson meant that he once helped an immigrant get deported, I am not sure that really counts. But if "Joe the Immigration Lawyer" is like "Joe the Plumber," then maybe he thinks he really was one.

    After all, an immigration lawyer would likely be able to understand what exactly the law means when it says that only citizens and permanent residents are covered under the Obama plan. What has caused Joe Wilson to react like this, besides a serious lack of self control, is the provision in the proposed legislation that eliminates the requirement of using the "SAVE" system to verify whether someone who is an immigrant, is legally in the United States. Use of this program has stopped very few undocumented immigrants from getting public benefits, but has stopped literally thousands of U.S. citizens, mostly poor, from obtaining benefits because of their lack of accessible proof of their citizenship.

    Factcheck.org has presented a short article on Seven Falsehoods About Health Care (http://www.factcheck.org/2009/08/seven-falsehoods-about-health-care/). One of those applies directly to this point:

    False: Illegal Immigrants Will Be Covered. One Republican congressman issued
    a press release claiming that "5,600,000 Illegal Aliens May Be Covered Under Obamacare (http://steveking.house.gov/index.cfm?FuseAction=Newsroom.PressReleases&ContentRecord_id=a294b300-19b9-b4b1-1296-659af869849a&Region_id=&Issue_id=)," and we�ve been peppered with queries about similar claims. They�re not true. In fact, the House bill (the only bill to be formally introduced in its entirety) specifically says that no federal money would be spent on giving illegal immigrants health coverage:

    H.R. 3200: Sec 246 � NO FEDERAL PAYMENT FOR UNDOCUMENTED ALIENS. Nothing in this subtitle shall allow Federal payments for affordability credits on behalf of individuals who are not lawfully present in the United States.

    Also, under current law, those in the country illegally don�t qualify for federal health programs. Of interest: About half of illegal immigrants have health insurance now, according to the nonpartisan Pew Hispanic Center, which says those who lack insurance do so principally because their employers don�t offer it."Misleading GOP Health Care Claims" (http://factcheck.org/2009/07/misleading-gop-health-care-claims/) July 23 � by Brooks Jackson, Viveca Novak, Lori Robertson and Jess Henig.


    I can certainly see both sides of the debate, and, frankly, neither side is being completely honest or clear. What is quite clear, is how immigration, and our broken immigration system, keeps coming up in the context of the debate of national agenda items, such as the health care debate.



    Several weeks ago I blogged on the danger that the tone of the Health care debate (http://ailaleadership.blogspot.com/2009/08/healthcare-debate-and-immigration.html)had for the coming immigration reform debate. Calling the President a Liar during his speech to a joint session to Congress is Exhibit A in what we have in store for the coming debate. If Joe Wilson the Immigration Lawyer can misrepresent the consequences of legislative language as straight forward as these two particular sections, we have to be prepared for the extraordinary misrepresentations of any positive aspects of an immigration reform bill. Whether it is "amnesty," "rewarding law breakers," "open borders," "Liars," or even "destroyers of American culture" we have to understand how to phrase and present the response. Without a doubt, the response from those of us who understand the need to balance immigration reform, with security concerns, and with economic growth has to be not only vocal, but focused. We, as Real Immigration Lawyers, must know the language of the proposed legislation, we must know the myths that are out there, and we need to be vocal in our response.




    Next week, more than 40 talk radio hosts are descending on Capital Hill for the FAIR (http://www.splcenter.org/intel/intelreport/article.jsp?aid=846)Annual Scare the Crap Out of Congress Boondoggle. The outrageous claims of the downfall of America caused by illegal immigration, along with similarly nutty myths will be presented as facts. Actual real news organization will cite the Center for Immigration Studies as a legitimate source of information. We must be prepared to call into our local radio stations, whose hosts are in D.C. next week, and be prepared to present the facts of immigration. Not by sugar coating the problems that are caused by illegal immigration, but rather by pointing out which specific laws are broken (INA 212(a)(9) anyone?) and how having a comprehensive solution can actually fix the immigration pothole in the legislative superhighway. Immigration Lawyers it is time to Stand Up and be vocal and beat back the immigration myths (http://www.aila.org/content/default.aspx?bc=27924).





    https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/186823568153827945-8070452709764975137?l=ailaleadership.blogspot.com


    More... (http://ailaleadership.blogspot.com/2009/09/liar-what-does-health-care-have-to-do.html)



    more...


    house 1971 Pontiac Le Mans Sport 1971 Pontiac Lemans Sport. Pontiac Lemans Sport 71
  • Pontiac Lemans Sport 71



  • Digitalosophy
    03-30 12:16 PM
    I'm impressed by the quality of all your guys' work. I voted mlkdave :)

    co-sign well done fellas





    tattoo LeMans 1971 Pontiac Lemans Sport. 1971 PONTIAC GT LEMANS SPORT
  • 1971 PONTIAC GT LEMANS SPORT



  • bheemi
    08-20 10:52 AM
    hi,
    i am same as u r case.
    u HAVE TO request your attorney or u r self should raise a service request and take infopass to start the processing case..unless u do something about it..they wont apply eb3 PD to EB2 pd autaomatically..they dont ahve any tracking system to do it..
    U have to fight for it..and raise service requests etc..



    more...


    pictures 1973 Pontiac Le Mans picture 1971 Pontiac Lemans Sport. 1972 Pontiac LeMans
  • 1972 Pontiac LeMans



  • yabadaba
    08-14 01:07 PM
    you asked if you were missing something... i said yes you are. u asked for an explanation..so be it..and i put in a disclaimer...that what you were missing was anybody's guess





    dresses Pontiac LeMans 1971 Pontiac Lemans Sport. 1971 pontiac lemans sport 400
  • 1971 pontiac lemans sport 400



  • ram_ram
    09-11 02:59 PM
    The PDF says

    FOR MORE INFORMATION CONTACT USCIS OCOMM 202.272.1200

    So may be we can call and ask them if the 140 times are less than 3 months, Did we miss our approvals in mail? :)


    http://www.uscis.gov/graphics/publicaffairs/USCISToday_Sep_06.pdf

    According to the illustrious director of uscis, Mr Emilio Gonzalez, the backlog reduction centers have made rapid progress. In feb 2004, form i140 took 11 months to clear, but as of july 2006, there are zero, i repeat 0 backlogs. It is awesome that he is focusing on the positive, but I would also like to know is how many hundreds of thousands are waiting for their first stage labor to clear.



    more...


    makeup former glory. Ryan 1971 Pontiac Lemans Sport. 1971 Pontiac Le Mans Sport
  • 1971 Pontiac Le Mans Sport



  • ragz4u
    05-11 05:42 PM
    While I was listening to this I was like we need to get this Amit dude to IV. Little did I know that he is already one :)

    You put out all our issues and pretty eloquently too. Good job :)





    girlfriend 1971 PONTIAC GT LEMANS SPORT 1971 Pontiac Lemans Sport. 1971 Pontiac Lemans Sport.
  • 1971 Pontiac Lemans Sport.



  • yabadaba
    08-14 12:27 PM
    yes u are





    hairstyles 1971 Pontiac Lemans Sport 1971 Pontiac Lemans Sport. 1971 Pontiac GTO convertible
  • 1971 Pontiac GTO convertible



  • shanti
    02-24 10:49 PM
    Thank you all for your answers, and we could agree that there is not a clear straightforward guideline regarding the AC21. So I have the following doubts:

    1- I really am not worried about the salary part, since the OCC code that the USCIS allocated for my labor certification pays in the area that I intend to work the same salary that their statistics show so that is fine. About the salary issue I talked with a couple of lawyer already,.

    2- This is what I am concerned and is about the experience part. I read online that for porting a labor (or some situation of the kind before filing I-485) that you cannot use the experience gained on the labor sponsoring company but you could use anything before that employer.

    Here is the question I have regarding that frozen experience clock:
    a- Before coming to US I had 5 ys expeirence
    b- WIth first H-1B sponsor company I worked 3 ys in U.S. until end of 2003
    c- I joined my current employer B on H-1B and worked there all 2004 and they filed for labor in Feb 2005. So my question is.. as previous experience

    I know I can count the three years with employer A since no labor there, but with employer B can I count that year before they filed for labor that I was under H-1b or I cannot count any experience gain before the labor was filed with employer B at all? I think that is the key question here.





    natrajs
    08-23 12:54 PM
    It is very unlikely to get a RFE for this

    I hope you don't get it, Try to get the Duplicate ASAP





    sriramkalyan
    06-04 10:25 AM
    That is last year bill ..
    It does not Point Based Immigration , Z visa, Y visa provisions



    No comments:

    Post a Comment