learning01
04-12 05:28 PM
Thanks.
wallpaper mission impossible girls.
immig4me
02-11 09:12 AM
I will respond too!
greensignal
12-28 08:45 PM
Hello Greensignal,
NSC is processing EB-3 based I-140 cases as of 6th April 2007, as per latest processing time release by USCIS. When did you file your I-140 in NSC?
Regards
I filed on August 15th 2007 and Receipt date is Oct'12
NSC is processing EB-3 based I-140 cases as of 6th April 2007, as per latest processing time release by USCIS. When did you file your I-140 in NSC?
Regards
I filed on August 15th 2007 and Receipt date is Oct'12
2011 mission impossible game for pc
aguy
07-27 02:37 PM
Hi,
My I-140 is pending, and my H1B renewal is also pending. Can I travel to India? If yes, what will I show as proof at re-entry?
How will it be for my wife? She is on F1 going on to OPT and a pending I-485 linked to my I-140 application.
Thanks.
My I-140 is pending, and my H1B renewal is also pending. Can I travel to India? If yes, what will I show as proof at re-entry?
How will it be for my wife? She is on F1 going on to OPT and a pending I-485 linked to my I-140 application.
Thanks.
more...
mrsr
06-25 12:11 PM
if we sign 28th june , it will be considered 1st july filing ?
GCwaitforever
09-21 12:28 PM
H-1B through non-profits like Universities does not have a cap. Your only bet would be to find a job through one such an entity and apply for H-1B. Then you can pursue H-1B through any commercial entity during 2008 quota starting from April 2007.
Please research Greencard process on the Internet.
Please research Greencard process on the Internet.
more...
pappu
08-25 01:22 PM
This is not the appropriate place to ask this question. Most of us here are still waiting to get our green card. You may find answer to your question at another forum that have people who already took the oath.
It is ok in my opinion. This is a 'Ask a lawyer' area and people can ask any immigration related question to the panel of IV lawyers for free. We now have 15 lawyers in IV panel.
It is ok in my opinion. This is a 'Ask a lawyer' area and people can ask any immigration related question to the panel of IV lawyers for free. We now have 15 lawyers in IV panel.
2010 mission impossible Image
hybrid101
04-02 10:10 AM
loved the "write a letter to become a mod" april fool joke the best:lol:
more...
wandmaker
02-11 08:51 AM
In re: All Immigration Matters on behalf of XYZ
Is it okay to sign on something like this? Or am I giving away permission for much more than they need, without knowing!
Hopefully it is okay to give a permission for "all immigration matters" but wanted to double check, just in case!
My attorney had the same text in my G28, I asked him the same question. It is fine, nothing to worry about.
Is it okay to sign on something like this? Or am I giving away permission for much more than they need, without knowing!
Hopefully it is okay to give a permission for "all immigration matters" but wanted to double check, just in case!
My attorney had the same text in my G28, I asked him the same question. It is fine, nothing to worry about.
hair from mission impossible.
satishku_2000
09-22 12:37 AM
Hi,
My pending I-140 (filed an year ago...June 2006) was transferred from TSC to NSC on 09/05/2007, because my I-485 was filed with NSC. What date willl NSC use as received date to process my case...the date they received from TSC or the original receipt date?
Isn't it(140 filed at TSC almost an year ago) supposed to be certified by now?
TSC has been much faster at certifying 140s . Looks like USCIS is transferrring the 140s from TSC ... I can only pray for alll concurrent fileres that filed at TSC ...
140s at NSC are almost taking an year according to latest processing times.
Just curious did you have an RFE?
My pending I-140 (filed an year ago...June 2006) was transferred from TSC to NSC on 09/05/2007, because my I-485 was filed with NSC. What date willl NSC use as received date to process my case...the date they received from TSC or the original receipt date?
Isn't it(140 filed at TSC almost an year ago) supposed to be certified by now?
TSC has been much faster at certifying 140s . Looks like USCIS is transferrring the 140s from TSC ... I can only pray for alll concurrent fileres that filed at TSC ...
140s at NSC are almost taking an year according to latest processing times.
Just curious did you have an RFE?
more...
kopra
01-30 10:57 AM
Yes, If you have enough Money, Usally 8,000-10,000 $ in the bank statement( This is checked for covering any Medical Bills etc when they are here, just to make sure that the sponser is able to take care of all these when they are in US), That would be enough for you to sponser them.
hot Mission Impossible
Blog Feeds
02-10 08:50 PM
Immigration Visa Attorney Blog Has Just Posted the Following:
http://www.immigrationvisaattorneyblog.com/flag_CNMI.gifAll immigration law attorneys must deal with foreign countries, unique international legal issues, and some quaint interpretations of law. The lawyers at Los Angeles' Fong & Chun are no exception, and in fact, this recent change affects some of our clients who do business in or own businesses in the Commonwealth of the Northern Mariana Islands (CNMI).
On 28 November 2008, "the United States" as defined for purposes of the Immigration & Nationality Act (INA) just got bigger, with the addition of the Commonwealth of the Northern Mariana Islands. Although there are probably wrinkles I have not yet read in the treaty, this essentially puts the CNMI on the same footing as Puerto Rico. Here's the cute part:
Because the CNMI will become part of the "United States" as defined by �101(a)(38) of the INA, "residence or presence in the CNMI before 28 November 2009 shall NOT be considered residence or physical presence within the USA for INA purposes. Thus, on 29 November 2009, all persons physically present in the CNMI are considered "to be present in the United States without inspection, by operation of law."
Will these PWIs (present without inspection) be eligible to adjust status? Unclear? Are they working "abroad" for purposes of L visas? Yes, as it turns out. One thing is clear: Legal Permanent Residents (so-called "green" card holders) who wish to base a naturalization application based on physical presence in the CNMI will NOT be able to do so for pre-29 November 2009 periods of time. Isn't this esoterica fun? --jcf
More... (http://www.immigrationvisaattorneyblog.com/2010/02/the-usa-is-bigger.html)
http://www.immigrationvisaattorneyblog.com/flag_CNMI.gifAll immigration law attorneys must deal with foreign countries, unique international legal issues, and some quaint interpretations of law. The lawyers at Los Angeles' Fong & Chun are no exception, and in fact, this recent change affects some of our clients who do business in or own businesses in the Commonwealth of the Northern Mariana Islands (CNMI).
On 28 November 2008, "the United States" as defined for purposes of the Immigration & Nationality Act (INA) just got bigger, with the addition of the Commonwealth of the Northern Mariana Islands. Although there are probably wrinkles I have not yet read in the treaty, this essentially puts the CNMI on the same footing as Puerto Rico. Here's the cute part:
Because the CNMI will become part of the "United States" as defined by �101(a)(38) of the INA, "residence or presence in the CNMI before 28 November 2009 shall NOT be considered residence or physical presence within the USA for INA purposes. Thus, on 29 November 2009, all persons physically present in the CNMI are considered "to be present in the United States without inspection, by operation of law."
Will these PWIs (present without inspection) be eligible to adjust status? Unclear? Are they working "abroad" for purposes of L visas? Yes, as it turns out. One thing is clear: Legal Permanent Residents (so-called "green" card holders) who wish to base a naturalization application based on physical presence in the CNMI will NOT be able to do so for pre-29 November 2009 periods of time. Isn't this esoterica fun? --jcf
More... (http://www.immigrationvisaattorneyblog.com/2010/02/the-usa-is-bigger.html)
more...
house Mission Impossible: Government
geevikram
06-30 12:31 PM
very nice post.
tattoo and Mission Impossible.
maddunr
12-31 03:05 PM
Change.gov is open for questions again - Round 2 this time.
http://change.gov/page/content/openforquestions20081229/
Can IV post a comprehensive question that all members can vote on?
If you do post a question, make sure to let us know what to search for ;-)
Thanks,
V
http://change.gov/page/content/openforquestions20081229/
Can IV post a comprehensive question that all members can vote on?
If you do post a question, make sure to let us know what to search for ;-)
Thanks,
V
more...
pictures mission impossible Image
sathishav
05-09 12:58 PM
Shanky,
As you already know, the H4 is only valid as long as your H1 is valid. If companyA has a policy or if in future they decide to revoke h1, then you may not even know.
If I were you , I will go ahead and file for h4 transfer too.
As you already know, the H4 is only valid as long as your H1 is valid. If companyA has a policy or if in future they decide to revoke h1, then you may not even know.
If I were you , I will go ahead and file for h4 transfer too.
dresses Max Payne Mission Impossible 3
aug2007
03-22 01:03 PM
While working for Company A, I took LC substitute (may 2007 as a future employer) for Compnay B and filed concurrent 140/485 in July 2007 fiasco (India EB3 PD Oct 2004). Later in Feb 08, I've joined Company B with H1 transfer while 140 & 485 were pending (for me and my spouse). I've not filed H4 ext for my wife thru company B as we both had VISA stamping from Company A till 4 Apr 09. I94 also has the same dates.
My H1 with company B got approved early this month (Took 12+ months after one RFE was answered in Oct 08). New H1 and I94 on Approved 797 has the date till 02 Oct 2010 (6 yrs from the first H1 start date). The I94 card number is not same as my previous I94 card. 140 got approved in Oct 08. I've valid EAD (renewed once) but never used it.
I'm curently on H1 and my wife is on H4. My wife's EAD is expired and I'm in the process of renewing it. My wife's H4 & I94 is expiring on 4 Apr 09 and I've not filed for H4 extn.
1. Do I need to file H4 extn? Or will my wife's status changes to AOS when the H4 & I94 expires? Will my status also have to change from H1 to AOS inorder for my wife's status to change to AOS?
2. If my wife can change to AOS while I'm on H1, can she start using EAD and I continue to be on H1?
3. If I'm on H1 and loose the job then I'll have to go back to India. But if I change my status to AOS/EAD then I can stay in US waiting for the next job. If I loose the job, can I change to EAD (after losing the job) or should it be done while I've job in hand?
4. If I switch to EAD and have some issue with 485 processing, can I switch back to H1 (Provided I'm still with the same employer and my H1 is valid)? What happens to my wife's staus in this case?
Thanks in advance for your guidance.
My H1 with company B got approved early this month (Took 12+ months after one RFE was answered in Oct 08). New H1 and I94 on Approved 797 has the date till 02 Oct 2010 (6 yrs from the first H1 start date). The I94 card number is not same as my previous I94 card. 140 got approved in Oct 08. I've valid EAD (renewed once) but never used it.
I'm curently on H1 and my wife is on H4. My wife's EAD is expired and I'm in the process of renewing it. My wife's H4 & I94 is expiring on 4 Apr 09 and I've not filed for H4 extn.
1. Do I need to file H4 extn? Or will my wife's status changes to AOS when the H4 & I94 expires? Will my status also have to change from H1 to AOS inorder for my wife's status to change to AOS?
2. If my wife can change to AOS while I'm on H1, can she start using EAD and I continue to be on H1?
3. If I'm on H1 and loose the job then I'll have to go back to India. But if I change my status to AOS/EAD then I can stay in US waiting for the next job. If I loose the job, can I change to EAD (after losing the job) or should it be done while I've job in hand?
4. If I switch to EAD and have some issue with 485 processing, can I switch back to H1 (Provided I'm still with the same employer and my H1 is valid)? What happens to my wife's staus in this case?
Thanks in advance for your guidance.
more...
makeup of Mission Impossible IV.
ras
12-23 01:39 AM
I have two I -140's approved with one PD from end of 2005 and other end of 2006 both on EB2. I 485 is based based on 2nd one in 2006. So question is can I port 2005 pd to I 485 based on 2006?
Some where I heard that you can only port the PD when your 2nd is application stage and is pending. but here it is applied and already approved. Is it a good case for Porting PD or interfiling?
And by the way what is the difference between porting and interfiling?
Thanks
Some where I heard that you can only port the PD when your 2nd is application stage and is pending. but here it is applied and already approved. Is it a good case for Porting PD or interfiling?
And by the way what is the difference between porting and interfiling?
Thanks
girlfriend Impossible Mission was the
ambals03
03-03 01:44 PM
It is at 5:30 pm EST at NBC Nightly news with Brian Williams.
hairstyles doing mission impossible
BharatPremi
10-19 11:31 PM
Make sure you do not travel out of USA before you get your approved AP, since as per the law if the person who filled I485 leaves the country without AP then it is considered that he abandoned his I485, with the exception given to H1B/H4 and L1/L2 (and youdont have any of these)
If you leave USA without AP then you need to restart the process, if you have AP then that is all you need to travel.
/\/\/\/\/\/ -- Second it.
If you leave USA without AP then you need to restart the process, if you have AP then that is all you need to travel.
/\/\/\/\/\/ -- Second it.
validIV
03-21 12:23 AM
http://www.forbes.com/2005/11/18/largest-charities-ratings_05charities_land.html
GCeffect
08-12 10:28 PM
no kiddin'....any time soon ? like in next one year?
All EB2's will becomes current before your turn (with horizontal spillover in works now)
All EB2's will becomes current before your turn (with horizontal spillover in works now)
No comments:
Post a Comment