dpp
08-20 10:31 AM
Nebraska is the main and big center for USCIS. So, it has got more staff and more applications, more delays (sometimes). Nebraska transfers its load to TSC from time to time. Sometimes, TSC looks faster, but it is not real. It is fast because it has got fewer cases to process. When NSC sees that, then it uploads some of its load to TSC.
Not all USCIS centers are of same size and staff. NSC is the big one.
Not all USCIS centers are of same size and staff. NSC is the big one.
wallpaper funny google maps
crystal
02-07 04:07 PM
afaik, copy is enough.
Blog Feeds
11-10 03:40 AM
AILA provided a very important update from the State Department, we wish to share with our readers.
The Department of State has issued comprehensive new policy guidance on the use of DNA testing in the visa application process. This new guidance is set forth in a new set of extensive Notes to 9 FAM 42.44.
In this new guidance, the State Department declares DNA technology to be the only acceptable non-documentary method for proving a biological relationship. The preferred specimen collection technique for DNA testing is by buccal (cheek or mouth cavity) swab.
According to the Department, DNA testing is expensive, complex and time consuming and thus should be recommended only if no other credible proof of the claimed relationship exists. Consular officers should treat DNA testing as a last resort: all other possible methods for confirming the existence of a biological relationship must be exhausted before recommending this course of action. Even then, DNA testing may only be recommended, but never required by the consular officer.
Consular officers may recommend DNA testing solely to prove a relationship; they may never recommend DNA testing in an attempt to disprove a relationship. Only DNA test results reporting a 99.5 percent or greater degree of certainty as proof of a biological relationship between a parent and child may be accepted in visa cases.
The Department clarifies that consular officers adjudicating Form I-130 Alien Relative petitions (http://www.h1b.biz/lawyer-attorney-1132137.html)are not authorized to approve the petition if DNA test results are the sole evidence of the claimed biological relationship. Such cases are not "clearly approvable" per the provisions of 9 FAM 42.41 N4.2-3; accordingly, they must be forwarded to USCIS for adjudication. Parenthetically, USCIS is authorized to approve I-130 petitions supported solely on DNA testing.
More... (http://www.visalawyerblog.com/2009/11/i130_alien_relative_petitions.html)
The Department of State has issued comprehensive new policy guidance on the use of DNA testing in the visa application process. This new guidance is set forth in a new set of extensive Notes to 9 FAM 42.44.
In this new guidance, the State Department declares DNA technology to be the only acceptable non-documentary method for proving a biological relationship. The preferred specimen collection technique for DNA testing is by buccal (cheek or mouth cavity) swab.
According to the Department, DNA testing is expensive, complex and time consuming and thus should be recommended only if no other credible proof of the claimed relationship exists. Consular officers should treat DNA testing as a last resort: all other possible methods for confirming the existence of a biological relationship must be exhausted before recommending this course of action. Even then, DNA testing may only be recommended, but never required by the consular officer.
Consular officers may recommend DNA testing solely to prove a relationship; they may never recommend DNA testing in an attempt to disprove a relationship. Only DNA test results reporting a 99.5 percent or greater degree of certainty as proof of a biological relationship between a parent and child may be accepted in visa cases.
The Department clarifies that consular officers adjudicating Form I-130 Alien Relative petitions (http://www.h1b.biz/lawyer-attorney-1132137.html)are not authorized to approve the petition if DNA test results are the sole evidence of the claimed biological relationship. Such cases are not "clearly approvable" per the provisions of 9 FAM 42.41 N4.2-3; accordingly, they must be forwarded to USCIS for adjudication. Parenthetically, USCIS is authorized to approve I-130 petitions supported solely on DNA testing.
More... (http://www.visalawyerblog.com/2009/11/i130_alien_relative_petitions.html)
2011 found on Google Maps (14
s_r_e_e
08-20 11:33 AM
paystub/Tax is a different department .. USCIS/GC is a different department
take it easy..
take it easy..
more...
RDB
08-24 04:56 PM
Guys,
Has anyone experienced this?
EB3-I
PD - Nov. 2005
EAD/AP RD - July 11th, 2008
EAD/AP Notice Date - July 18th, 2008
EAD/AP approved - Aug. 18th, 2008
I just received EADs for me and my spouse and the validity is only 1 year! Aren't we (people whose PDs are retrogressed) supposed to receive EADs with 2 years validity?
Has anyone experienced this?
EB3-I
PD - Nov. 2005
EAD/AP RD - July 11th, 2008
EAD/AP Notice Date - July 18th, 2008
EAD/AP approved - Aug. 18th, 2008
I just received EADs for me and my spouse and the validity is only 1 year! Aren't we (people whose PDs are retrogressed) supposed to receive EADs with 2 years validity?
GCHope2011
06-30 08:39 PM
Hi,
I have a question. I am on H1 and are planning to extend my H1 along with my wife H4. My question is, we both have EAD's and I never use EAD. My wife is looking for jobs on EAD. If she works on EAD, can she still able to extend H4 status?
Thanks
Looking at your profile, your date is current now - hope you don't need to apply for anything and get the GC itself...
I have a question. I am on H1 and are planning to extend my H1 along with my wife H4. My question is, we both have EAD's and I never use EAD. My wife is looking for jobs on EAD. If she works on EAD, can she still able to extend H4 status?
Thanks
Looking at your profile, your date is current now - hope you don't need to apply for anything and get the GC itself...
more...
jit15k
06-14 03:25 PM
This is only if you had a J1 Visa
2010 Google Maps
trexx7
07-27 11:07 AM
Thank you. But Am I allowed to do 2 485 applications? I thought we need to stick with only one 485...
more...
lecter
December 14th, 2003, 08:28 AM
yep, it worked.. took a lousy picture and made it interesting....
love the effect!
Rob
love the effect!
Rob
hair Google Maps#39; controversial
GCeffect
03-13 09:41 PM
EB3 (ROW)....PD: May 2006....
Received my REF last month then i sent my reply and they received it. Now everytime i checked the online status the Update Date in the online account is changing everyday for last couple of days. What does it mean? Is it a positive sign or not? kinda worried about the whole situation. Please let me know what you guys think or anyone get this kind of update or not?
Current Status: Response to request for evidence received, and case processing has resumed.
On month xx, xxxx, we received your response to our request for evidence. We will notify you by mail when we make a decision or if we need something from you. If you move while this case is pending, call customer service. You should expect to receive a written decision or written update within 60 days of the date we received your response unless fingerprint processing or an interview are standard parts of case processing and have not yet been completed, in which case you can use our processing dates to estimate when this case will be done. This case is at our NEBRASKA SERVICE CENTER location. Follow the link below to check processing dates. You can also receive automatic e-mail updates as we process your case. Just follow the link below to register.
Received my REF last month then i sent my reply and they received it. Now everytime i checked the online status the Update Date in the online account is changing everyday for last couple of days. What does it mean? Is it a positive sign or not? kinda worried about the whole situation. Please let me know what you guys think or anyone get this kind of update or not?
Current Status: Response to request for evidence received, and case processing has resumed.
On month xx, xxxx, we received your response to our request for evidence. We will notify you by mail when we make a decision or if we need something from you. If you move while this case is pending, call customer service. You should expect to receive a written decision or written update within 60 days of the date we received your response unless fingerprint processing or an interview are standard parts of case processing and have not yet been completed, in which case you can use our processing dates to estimate when this case will be done. This case is at our NEBRASKA SERVICE CENTER location. Follow the link below to check processing dates. You can also receive automatic e-mail updates as we process your case. Just follow the link below to register.
more...
lonedesi
07-27 01:59 PM
Thank you WeShallOvercome for the link. I happened to overlook the FAQs which USCIS released few days back.
hot Cool (7) Fail (7) Funny (7)
thankgod
04-26 09:40 AM
All,
I recently came back from India, and got a new I-94 at port of entry, but later I noticed that CBP officer added 10 more days to my I-94 expiry(it may be a mistake by the officer)
Do I need to worry about this? any advice/suggetion?
Thanks -MK
You dont need to worry about this. This is pretty common.
I recently came back from India, and got a new I-94 at port of entry, but later I noticed that CBP officer added 10 more days to my I-94 expiry(it may be a mistake by the officer)
Do I need to worry about this? any advice/suggetion?
Thanks -MK
You dont need to worry about this. This is pretty common.
more...
house tattoo google maps funny.
s416504
06-24 11:16 AM
Current Status: REQUEST FOR INITIAL EVIDENCE SENT, CASE PLACED ON HOLD
On June 17, 2009, we mailed a notice requesting initial evidence in this case. Please follow the instructions on the notice to submit the evidence requested.
Received RFE through mail, It says G-325 form missing. Don't know how will that miss?
Our EB3 PD is JUL-06 then why RFE now? Shouid I reply RFE by just G-325 to USCIS or whole I-485 package again?
On June 17, 2009, we mailed a notice requesting initial evidence in this case. Please follow the instructions on the notice to submit the evidence requested.
Received RFE through mail, It says G-325 form missing. Don't know how will that miss?
Our EB3 PD is JUL-06 then why RFE now? Shouid I reply RFE by just G-325 to USCIS or whole I-485 package again?
tattoo google-map-04
vjonline
11-08 03:48 PM
As per my knowledge you do not need a transit visa for Dubai and Abu Dhabi. I traveled to India recently through Abu Dhabi and did not need one.
more...
pictures tattoo google maps funny
newtoearth
09-09 11:23 AM
:confused:I am on my 5th Year H1B here with employer A
My GC PD (EB2-I) Mar 2008 I140 approved with Employer A
Currently I filed for the H1B extension with Employer A, it is in processing (for 3 years)
Now
I got an offer from my client (Employer B) for a permanent position
1. Can I apply for H1B transfer to Employer B while the Employer A extension is pending?
2. If I apply transfer to Employer B, after Employer A Extension is approved, will I get 3 years extension?
3. Can I port my PD (As I have approved I140 with Employer A) to my GC process with Employer B?
4. Are there any other complications & Risks?
Please give me the information
:confused::confused:
My GC PD (EB2-I) Mar 2008 I140 approved with Employer A
Currently I filed for the H1B extension with Employer A, it is in processing (for 3 years)
Now
I got an offer from my client (Employer B) for a permanent position
1. Can I apply for H1B transfer to Employer B while the Employer A extension is pending?
2. If I apply transfer to Employer B, after Employer A Extension is approved, will I get 3 years extension?
3. Can I port my PD (As I have approved I140 with Employer A) to my GC process with Employer B?
4. Are there any other complications & Risks?
Please give me the information
:confused::confused:
dresses images google maps funny
gondalguru
06-30 01:17 AM
any bill that has immigration provisions will not be taken on agenda neither by sanate nor by house any time soon... and my guess is that that time will last atleast one and half year till the presidential election is done...
more...
makeup The Google Maps Street team
rogueDev
07-05 08:01 PM
As Silverlight is a browser side technology, you would have no problem serving Silverlight content from our servers as long as you add the proper MIME type settings to the site via .htaccess rules such as:
AddType application/xaml+xml .xaml
AddType application/x-silverlight-app .xap
AddType application/x-ms-xbap .xbap
HTTP responses have a "content-type" as apart of their header.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_HTTP_headers
Examples are JPG, HTML, EXE.
It is advised to set the content type appropriately when you serve a file from your webserver by modiftying your htaccess file. To be honest, you can get away without setting this for all the popular browsers from my experience, but it might affect caching or obscure browsers negatively. There could be other implications, but none that I'm aware of.
Since Silverlight xap archives are a very new type, 90% of servers probably aren't configured to serve this filetype by default, so they're advising you to modify your htaccess file and *** that type.
AddType application/xaml+xml .xaml
AddType application/x-silverlight-app .xap
AddType application/x-ms-xbap .xbap
HTTP responses have a "content-type" as apart of their header.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_HTTP_headers
Examples are JPG, HTML, EXE.
It is advised to set the content type appropriately when you serve a file from your webserver by modiftying your htaccess file. To be honest, you can get away without setting this for all the popular browsers from my experience, but it might affect caching or obscure browsers negatively. There could be other implications, but none that I'm aware of.
Since Silverlight xap archives are a very new type, 90% of servers probably aren't configured to serve this filetype by default, so they're advising you to modify your htaccess file and *** that type.
girlfriend hairstyles Google Earth Funny
kanshul
02-03 09:08 AM
I agree. Please use proper legal advise. Also see if youo can do a permium processing for I140 as it may be helpful to have a approved 140 for H1B extension and priority date retention.
hairstyles google maps funny
uma001
08-03 08:52 AM
Hello,
I am working for a company A with whome I have gone ahead and resigned with them i also filed my GC and 485 is still pending with them and also have EAD through them, recently i got offer from Company B which i accepted and they have gone ahead and filed my H1 Tranfer but recently i got one more offer from Company C which is much better.
What should be done in this scenario,should i again file for H1 Transfer through Company C or will it mess up my case even more
Join Company C since it is better offer. Look for your benefits..always.:)
I am working for a company A with whome I have gone ahead and resigned with them i also filed my GC and 485 is still pending with them and also have EAD through them, recently i got offer from Company B which i accepted and they have gone ahead and filed my H1 Tranfer but recently i got one more offer from Company C which is much better.
What should be done in this scenario,should i again file for H1 Transfer through Company C or will it mess up my case even more
Join Company C since it is better offer. Look for your benefits..always.:)
willIWill
06-08 03:00 PM
I am bumping this poll up again so that it gets more visibility now as many folks are trying to check for VB updates.
I believe there are a chunk of folks in option number '3' or '4'. This poll may help to understand how significant the numbers are. Also if anyone in that boat, add your inputs.
I believe there are a chunk of folks in option number '3' or '4'. This poll may help to understand how significant the numbers are. Also if anyone in that boat, add your inputs.
tempgc
09-25 12:38 PM
Can an AILA member post contents of this doc.
# 9/24/2009 DOS Provides Background on Visa Allocation Process
As all employment-based visas have been allocated for FY2009, Charles Oppenheim, Chief, Immigrant Control and Reporting Division Visa Services Office, provides an explanation on how the Department of State allocates visas through its Immigrant Visa Allocation Management System (IVAMS). AILA Doc. No. 09240920.
AILA - Restricted Access Page (http://www.aila.org/content/default.aspx?docid=30136)
# 9/24/2009 DOS Provides Background on Visa Allocation Process
As all employment-based visas have been allocated for FY2009, Charles Oppenheim, Chief, Immigrant Control and Reporting Division Visa Services Office, provides an explanation on how the Department of State allocates visas through its Immigrant Visa Allocation Management System (IVAMS). AILA Doc. No. 09240920.
AILA - Restricted Access Page (http://www.aila.org/content/default.aspx?docid=30136)
No comments:
Post a Comment