AllVNeedGcPc
05-12 10:59 AM
Your PD is already current now:
Visa Bulletin For June 2011 (http://www.travel.state.gov/visa/bulletin/bulletin_5452.html)
Hi all
My I-485 is pending(EB-3,India)since 2007. I changed employer & successfully ported PD on new I-140 approval in EB-2 category. My PD is in Oct 2006 & I expect that to become current in the coming few months.
Now, I need to do Interfiling to link my pending I-485 to my new I-140.
(1) What all documents/wordings are required for interfiling? Can someone pls provide a checklist?
(2) Who should do Interfiling- Myself or "Attorney of File" on my original I-485 or my current attorney (who did my new I-140)?
(3) Can I send my Interfiling request to USCIS even before my PD becomes current?
Thanks
Sameer
Visa Bulletin For June 2011 (http://www.travel.state.gov/visa/bulletin/bulletin_5452.html)
Hi all
My I-485 is pending(EB-3,India)since 2007. I changed employer & successfully ported PD on new I-140 approval in EB-2 category. My PD is in Oct 2006 & I expect that to become current in the coming few months.
Now, I need to do Interfiling to link my pending I-485 to my new I-140.
(1) What all documents/wordings are required for interfiling? Can someone pls provide a checklist?
(2) Who should do Interfiling- Myself or "Attorney of File" on my original I-485 or my current attorney (who did my new I-140)?
(3) Can I send my Interfiling request to USCIS even before my PD becomes current?
Thanks
Sameer
wallpaper Showing Los Angeles some love
ronhira
03-22 06:40 PM
tom friedman doesn't know about the details of this issue..... for him immigration means more h1b visa..... he doesn't have a clue @ gc mess...... there r others who have done research on this subject.... but those studies did not get as much attention.... maybe others need to come up with a shape... lets pick one.... lets say "earth is rhombus".... and then publish these reports... that might help catch some attention....
Source - http://www.nfap.com/pdf/071206study.pdf
"THE CHILDREN OF H-1B VISA HOLDERS
At the 2004 Intel Science Talent Search, the nation’s premiere science competition for top high school students, the National Foundation for American Policy conducted interviews to determine the immigration background of the 40 finalists. The results: two-thirds of the Intel Science Talent Search finalists were the children of immigrants. And even though new H-1B visa holders each year represent only 0.03 percent of the U.S. population, it turns out more of the children had parents who entered the country on H-1B visas than had parents born in the United States. In other words, if critics had their way, many of the coming generation’s top scientists and engineers would not be here in the United States today – because we never would have allowed in their parents."
Source - http://www.nfap.com/pdf/071206study.pdf
"THE CHILDREN OF H-1B VISA HOLDERS
At the 2004 Intel Science Talent Search, the nation’s premiere science competition for top high school students, the National Foundation for American Policy conducted interviews to determine the immigration background of the 40 finalists. The results: two-thirds of the Intel Science Talent Search finalists were the children of immigrants. And even though new H-1B visa holders each year represent only 0.03 percent of the U.S. population, it turns out more of the children had parents who entered the country on H-1B visas than had parents born in the United States. In other words, if critics had their way, many of the coming generation’s top scientists and engineers would not be here in the United States today – because we never would have allowed in their parents."
REEF�
05-09 08:32 PM
Looks really nice sharif ;) Reminds me of your grunge days on the forums last year!Lol yea...I'm not sure if this is exactly grunge, it looks more like a pixelish graphicified brushed sort of thing...never mind.
:beer:
:beer:
2011 NLDS Game 3: Los Angeles
Blog Feeds
03-26 08:30 AM
https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEg7eR48aj1ZsNIaKqt7Sta8H4n0HM7LtXyakfcxXdTcQfKPZXA7yWxotHhLFshbuSDT5rLagRgomVXi7jwyPz6Kc-DWuiLVe0Rnd6feSD_mSCJi9_wAYqIcA9tn6vXfg7SJ6l-W5hgPE9qA/s320/uscisLogo.gif (https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEg7eR48aj1ZsNIaKqt7Sta8H4n0HM7LtXyakfcxXdTcQfKPZXA7yWxotHhLFshbuSDT5rLagRgomVXi7jwyPz6Kc-DWuiLVe0Rnd6feSD_mSCJi9_wAYqIcA9tn6vXfg7SJ6l-W5hgPE9qA/s1600/uscisLogo.gif)
DHS has publicized initiatives to enhance the E-verify program here. (http://www.uscis.gov/portal/site/uscis/menuitem.5af9bb95919f35e66f614176543f6d1a/?vgnextoid=70beadd907c67210VgnVCM100000082ca60aRCR D&vgnextchannel=68439c7755cb9010VgnVCM10000045f3d6a1 RCRD) The initiatives include:
(1) a new agreement with the Department of Justice that will streamline the adjudication process in cases of E-Verify misuse and discrimination;
(2) an informational telephone hotline for employees to provide a more timely, effective and seamless customer experience for workers seeking E-Verify information; and
(3) new training videos focusing on E-Verify procedures and policies, employee rights and employer responsibilities in English and Spanish.
The DHS's fact Sheet answers questions such as when and why E-Verify will share information with DOJ, what information it will share, what videos are available and where, how the employee hotline will work, what issues it will address, etc.
For more information on E-Verify, see my prior blog posts here (http://martinvisalaw.blogspot.com/search/label/e-verify).
https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/2893395975825897727-4975328970061257470?l=martinvisalaw.blogspot.com
More... (http://martinvisalaw.blogspot.com/2010/03/dhs-plans-to-enhance-e-verify.html)
DHS has publicized initiatives to enhance the E-verify program here. (http://www.uscis.gov/portal/site/uscis/menuitem.5af9bb95919f35e66f614176543f6d1a/?vgnextoid=70beadd907c67210VgnVCM100000082ca60aRCR D&vgnextchannel=68439c7755cb9010VgnVCM10000045f3d6a1 RCRD) The initiatives include:
(1) a new agreement with the Department of Justice that will streamline the adjudication process in cases of E-Verify misuse and discrimination;
(2) an informational telephone hotline for employees to provide a more timely, effective and seamless customer experience for workers seeking E-Verify information; and
(3) new training videos focusing on E-Verify procedures and policies, employee rights and employer responsibilities in English and Spanish.
The DHS's fact Sheet answers questions such as when and why E-Verify will share information with DOJ, what information it will share, what videos are available and where, how the employee hotline will work, what issues it will address, etc.
For more information on E-Verify, see my prior blog posts here (http://martinvisalaw.blogspot.com/search/label/e-verify).
https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/2893395975825897727-4975328970061257470?l=martinvisalaw.blogspot.com
More... (http://martinvisalaw.blogspot.com/2010/03/dhs-plans-to-enhance-e-verify.html)
more...
doshhar
10-08 09:54 PM
I did apply at NSC and got receipt notices from Texas.. It's simple..
invincibleasian
02-10 05:22 PM
Dear Fellow Posters
After 12 months of toil I have finally completed the narrative and evidence that I need for an EB-1a (Extraordinary Alien) application. I ab about to complete the I-140 paperwork to go with it.
My questions is this - I have contacted a small number of Immigration attorneys who have quoted me approx $6000 for the whole process. How many of you value think that USCIS would look at my application more favourably if I used a reputed attorney rathen than putting in my own application and paperwork ?
Thanks in anticpation of your replies
Jon
USCIS will be interested in the content of the application rather than the reputation of the attorney submitting it. You are free to submit your own application if you are comfortable researching immigration laws required for your application.
After 12 months of toil I have finally completed the narrative and evidence that I need for an EB-1a (Extraordinary Alien) application. I ab about to complete the I-140 paperwork to go with it.
My questions is this - I have contacted a small number of Immigration attorneys who have quoted me approx $6000 for the whole process. How many of you value think that USCIS would look at my application more favourably if I used a reputed attorney rathen than putting in my own application and paperwork ?
Thanks in anticpation of your replies
Jon
USCIS will be interested in the content of the application rather than the reputation of the attorney submitting it. You are free to submit your own application if you are comfortable researching immigration laws required for your application.
more...
eb3_nepa
08-29 05:13 PM
There is NO WAY to update ur answer on the poll.
I did see my checks cashed today and the application was received on July 2 by PITCHER.
I did see my checks cashed today and the application was received on July 2 by PITCHER.
2010 Los Angeles Dodgers Manny
Seajc
04-06 02:12 PM
Hello,
My husband and I got married in December 2008 while I was a tourist in the United States. In order to stay and live with him, I sent an I-485 application with all the package (I-131, I-765, I-693...).
I have received 2 advanced paroles and my work authorization and will have a SSN in proably 2 weeks but the green card, if accepted, will come very late.
Now I really would like to visit my family and friends in Belgium for Christmas (or later, regarding to the job I will have) and I have heard that the advanced parole will not help me a whole lot.
So my questions are:
- Who should I contact to be sure that my husband and myself can go visit my family without any problem at the border, I mean, with the certitude I can come back in Pennsylvania with my husband? The customer service is not really helpfull this time.
- Can I do it at all without beginning everything from the beginning and restarting all the immigration procedure?
- What and to whom do I need to proove that I don't do anything bad and that I just want to visit my family and friends?
- What kind of documents do I need to take with me? What kind of forms do I have to send to USCIS or DHS?
I know it's not a question of life or death and there are a lot more urgent problems for other people, but I psychologically need to visit them and present my husband to some of my friends.
Could you please help me? Thank you.
My husband and I got married in December 2008 while I was a tourist in the United States. In order to stay and live with him, I sent an I-485 application with all the package (I-131, I-765, I-693...).
I have received 2 advanced paroles and my work authorization and will have a SSN in proably 2 weeks but the green card, if accepted, will come very late.
Now I really would like to visit my family and friends in Belgium for Christmas (or later, regarding to the job I will have) and I have heard that the advanced parole will not help me a whole lot.
So my questions are:
- Who should I contact to be sure that my husband and myself can go visit my family without any problem at the border, I mean, with the certitude I can come back in Pennsylvania with my husband? The customer service is not really helpfull this time.
- Can I do it at all without beginning everything from the beginning and restarting all the immigration procedure?
- What and to whom do I need to proove that I don't do anything bad and that I just want to visit my family and friends?
- What kind of documents do I need to take with me? What kind of forms do I have to send to USCIS or DHS?
I know it's not a question of life or death and there are a lot more urgent problems for other people, but I psychologically need to visit them and present my husband to some of my friends.
Could you please help me? Thank you.
more...
number30
05-24 11:08 PM
my wife is filing her I-485 based on my filed I-485 under EB2. Do I need to include an affidavit of support I-864.
sounak
NO. I-864 is for family based cases only. Some people include I-134 But not required
sounak
NO. I-864 is for family based cases only. Some people include I-134 But not required
hair the Los Angeles Dodgers
newworld
04-06 11:36 AM
WASHINGTON - Senate Republicans and Democrats closed in on a last-minute compromise Thursday on legislation opening the way to legal status and eventual citizenship for many of the 11 million immigrants living in the United States illegally.
Sen. John McCain, R-Ariz., said he had been assured President Bush supports the measure, and would publicly say so later in the day.
As outlined, the measure would provide for enhanced border security, regulate the future flow of immigrants into the United States and offer legalized status to the millions of men, women and children in the country unlawfully.
"We've had a huge breakthrough" overnight, said Majority Leader Bill Frist, R-Tenn.
Not done deal yet
Sen. Harry Reid of Nevada, the Democratic leader, agreed, but cautioned that the agreement had not yet been sealed.
Even so, the presence of both leaders at a celebratory news conference underlined the expectation that the Senate could pass the most sweeping immigration bill in two decades, and act before leaving on a long vacation at the end of the week.
The developments marked a turnaround from Wednesday, when it appeared negotiations had faltered. The key sticking point involved the 11 million illegal immigrants in the country, and the struggle to provide them an opportunity to gain legal status without exposing lawmakers to the political charge that they were advocating amnesty for lawbreakers.
While final details were not available, in general, the compromise would require illegal immigrants who have been in the United States between two years and five years to return to their home country briefly, then re-enter as temporary workers. They could then begin a process of seeking citizenship.
Illegal immigrants here longer than five years would not be required to return home; those in the country less than two years would be required to leave without assurances of returning, and take their place in line with others seeking entry papers.
Sen. John McCain, R-Ariz., said he had been assured President Bush supports the measure, and would publicly say so later in the day.
As outlined, the measure would provide for enhanced border security, regulate the future flow of immigrants into the United States and offer legalized status to the millions of men, women and children in the country unlawfully.
"We've had a huge breakthrough" overnight, said Majority Leader Bill Frist, R-Tenn.
Not done deal yet
Sen. Harry Reid of Nevada, the Democratic leader, agreed, but cautioned that the agreement had not yet been sealed.
Even so, the presence of both leaders at a celebratory news conference underlined the expectation that the Senate could pass the most sweeping immigration bill in two decades, and act before leaving on a long vacation at the end of the week.
The developments marked a turnaround from Wednesday, when it appeared negotiations had faltered. The key sticking point involved the 11 million illegal immigrants in the country, and the struggle to provide them an opportunity to gain legal status without exposing lawmakers to the political charge that they were advocating amnesty for lawbreakers.
While final details were not available, in general, the compromise would require illegal immigrants who have been in the United States between two years and five years to return to their home country briefly, then re-enter as temporary workers. They could then begin a process of seeking citizenship.
Illegal immigrants here longer than five years would not be required to return home; those in the country less than two years would be required to leave without assurances of returning, and take their place in line with others seeking entry papers.
more...
tejaKamina
12-09 07:14 PM
All,
I am in a bit of confusion and needed some info. I had applied for I-485 during July fiasco and my spouse applied as derivative. We had applied for her H1 extension/transfer through another employer after we filed for I-485 as we did not want her to use EAD. We recently received her H-1 approval without I-94.
I am not sure at this point if she has to leave immediately to get the h1 stamp Or she can continue to stay here as her AOS is pending based on derivative status of my application.
Also will her getting approved without I-94 impact her pending AOS in anyway
I am in a bit of confusion and needed some info. I had applied for I-485 during July fiasco and my spouse applied as derivative. We had applied for her H1 extension/transfer through another employer after we filed for I-485 as we did not want her to use EAD. We recently received her H-1 approval without I-94.
I am not sure at this point if she has to leave immediately to get the h1 stamp Or she can continue to stay here as her AOS is pending based on derivative status of my application.
Also will her getting approved without I-94 impact her pending AOS in anyway
hot Los Angeles Dodgers Neoprene
Queen Josephine
June 15th, 2005, 09:13 PM
My eye is drawn to that probiscus on the butterfly..... looks like a french horn or something! I can't tell you enough....you've been doing incredible work with your new camera. Agree with above comments about the cactus and disembodied foot.