Popular Post
Recent Post

Popular Posts

Wednesday, June 15, 2011

quotes for your friends

images Places to Share Your Funny quotes for your friends. cute love quotes your
  • cute love quotes your



  • DDD
    02-18 12:14 AM
    every package except LW has a free trial.





    wallpaper cute love quotes your quotes for your friends. cute quotes for your best
  • cute quotes for your best



  • sent
    07-24 04:52 AM
    My Lawyer says there is no need of such letter to be included and filed my papers and confident about getting that approved. I'm much worried and don't know what to do If gets rejected.

    Sent an email to my lawyer again and waiting for his reply.

    Any clue How to handle this?





    quotes for your friends. add your friends on layout
  • add your friends on layout



  • PresidentO
    03-10 01:31 PM
    I have been lurking on this forum to understand the plight of EB immigrants and the posts the last few weeks have confirmed my belief that the problem exist because a lot of people came to the US from 1999-2006 and want to stay here permanently. The EB immigration system was fine before then; thus, the problem is supply/demand, not the immigration policies.

    Let me guess. You are brother/sister of Ron Hira who is in bed with programmers guild and who wants to shut the golden door as soon as he is done. Ron and ilk would never say that they/their parent's stole an American job. They are all genuine and we are all fraud. If you can stay permanently, We can too. Cut the crap! Kid

    You showed your two big foot in your mouth by saying that immigration policy has nothing to do with this and this is purely supply/demand. Whom are you trying to kid? Supply and demand changed because the immigration policy changed. H1B visas were increased from 65K to 195K, without a increase in the GC numbers. Folks on the hill made businesses happy by increasing the H1B numbers and did not care a rat's ass about how the increase will choke the GC system. The effect is compounded with 245i and USCIS inefficiency. But the root cause is policy that did not encompass all aspects of Employment based immigration.

    You moron! People just did not come here night over night flying on their wings. It is the policy stupid that created the supply/demand problem. You don't need to lurk and then lash out by taking a conversation out of context. The guy who quoted the 2A was just quoting the retrogression times in EB and FB and was pointing out the absurdity. Of all the people, you thought EB folks dont care about family and unification issues. Yeah right! What else you gotta spit?





    2011 cute quotes for your best quotes for your friends. Quotes with your friends
  • Quotes with your friends



  • refiling 485
    07-18 11:06 AM
    My application reached on July 2nd at 10:00 AM and haven't heard anything from them. Mine is a June case.



    more...


    quotes for your friends. quotes to your friends.
  • quotes to your friends.



  • jsquare
    08-19 04:45 PM
    Hi,

    This is for EAD Renewal (I-765)

    I was working on H1 till May 08 now I am working on EAD

    What should I write in column 15.(Current Immigration Status) in I-765 form

    When I was on H1 in 2007, during first time EAD appliaction I filled with H1B


    Please advice.

    Thanks
    JSQUARE





    quotes for your friends. quotes to your friends!
  • quotes to your friends!



  • sroyc
    02-14 09:57 PM
    The current case is over 50% of H-1B issued to Indian and Chinese every year. And that is why now most people here are waiting.
    Do you think RoW H-1B applicants should shout loud and ask for the country limit to be set on H-1B?

    That would be one way of preventing the creation of two different classes of skilled immigrant workers in the workforce. Please note that the distinction between these classes is not based on profession or skill level but based on country of birth.

    It simply defies common sense that the quota is not enforced anywhere in the immigration pipeline except the I-485 approval. I would be more accepting of this policy if it were applied uniformly - while issuing student and work visas, PERM and I-140 applications along with the I-485 application.



    more...


    quotes for your friends. quotes to your friends!
  • quotes to your friends!



  • sneha.shah
    04-24 01:31 PM
    Hi,

    I am currently on L1B visa since Mar09, another employer is offering for my h1b visa. I have below queries for l1 to h1 conversion process :

    1) How much time I can stay on H1 if I apply H1b now ? My total stay in US on L1 is 1 year 7 months, not a continuous one !!!
    2) What are the good options/approach to file for H1 considering the fact that I want work with current employer on L1B for current project ?
    3) Can I apply for H1 now and later do COS any time after October ?If yes, what is the max time before I need to do COS after H1 approval ?
    4) How about if my current project completes before oct 1st and I have already applied for h1 ?

    Kindly help me for above questions, would appreciate your help.

    Thanks in advance.





    2010 add your friends on layout quotes for your friends. Places to Share Your Funny
  • Places to Share Your Funny



  • sidbee
    03-12 10:20 AM
    IV needs to OPEN ITS BOOKS

    And show DONORS where their money is going? Where is the sponsors money going? and what is this ORGANIZATION planning to do. IF not, one these days they will find themselves in a audit and public scrutiny.

    Any yes people who says open your eyes? Have you got your GC? EAD is only a means and not the destination


    PAPU, you need to explain to all IV members and disclose the books and what you are doing as IV head, and dont give me the bull, of we are working, you want our support, we want clarity and real action.


    If this happens, i would like to donate to IV.

    I cannot trust anyone blindly, thats my problem.



    more...


    quotes for your friends. funny quotes to say to your
  • funny quotes to say to your



  • nixstor
    07-02 10:50 PM
    I support online petition idea and can get more than 50 friends to sign it.

    Lets start it as soon as possible so it can have an positive impact on those three pending bills that will be presented to Congress this summer.

    Thanks.

    If web faxes to the representatives offices have not made an impact, How will a petition on a third party website will make an impact?

    I don't mean to dampen any one's enthusiasm here but we have been clearly the best ways to make an impact on a law maker's decision are

    (1) Go to their offices and meet their legislative assistant/ aide's
    (2) Call them.

    If you haven't called Rep Smith's office, call now. If you did encourage your friends from San Antonio / Austin area to do so.





    hair Quotes with your friends quotes for your friends. funny quotes to say to your
  • funny quotes to say to your



  • ArkBird
    02-19 05:34 PM
    I wish congress spends atleast 10% of the time our fellow IVans are spending here to discuss this bill!



    more...


    quotes for your friends. funny quotes to say to your
  • funny quotes to say to your



  • varshadas
    11-29 03:41 PM
    My PD is Oct 2002 - EB3.
    140 cleared.

    I can be reached at varshadas@hotmail.com

    We need to have a conference call between us and then go and meet whoever we have to.

    We have to be very clear on what we have to talk about and must bring the issues to light in a way that will have a lasting effect on the listener.





    hot quotes to your friends. quotes for your friends. Share with your friends
  • Share with your friends



  • MDix
    03-10 02:22 PM
    If you feel good by giving red then pls do it, but that doesn't change what's coming in your way.

    This is turning out to be TRUE.

    Past week, I made this comment and some people made fun of it. But, it's turning out to be true. They are now fully focusing on EB3 and I think they will continue to do untill they finish all Eb3. Once they reached last quarter then they will make EB2-I/C current and distribute those spill-over visas across EB. They don't have to make EB3-ROW current to give some spill-over to EB3-I. What ever will be left at the end of quarter will be spilled across EB's.


    I am expecting lot of REDs on this one.

    Thanks,
    MDix



    more...


    house quotes about your mom. quotes quotes for your friends. quotes about your best friend.
  • quotes about your best friend.



  • walking_dude
    10-30 06:38 PM
    Thanks for sending the FOIA letter. I don't get the not able to vote part! Every logged in IV member should be able to vote. Where you logged in?

    I hope the 70 is not correct. I sent in the FOIA request (notarized) and also mobilized few of my friends. The number 70 is incorrect, because it does not allow me to vote there, otherwise I am sure it would be atleast 71.





    tattoo quotes to your friends! quotes for your friends. thinking of your friends,
  • thinking of your friends,



  • eb3retro
    08-16 03:39 PM
    Because you guys are not as clever as EB2s.



    easy there pray...people can get offended by your statement. Not a good statement for your first post.



    more...


    pictures quotes to your friends! quotes for your friends. and quotes for your.
  • and quotes for your.



  • dkjariwala
    04-08 11:54 PM
    nyte,

    The person was on H1B visa.





    dresses Share with your friends quotes for your friends. Friend Quotes - Friendship
  • Friend Quotes - Friendship



  • bostonqa
    04-24 01:33 PM
    I also got my "Card production ordered" status few days back.

    however I also received a mail for biometrics appointment of 05/02?

    the biometrics letter date is 4/14 and my "Card production" status change was on 04/21.

    why would they send me a biometrics appointment and then approve my 485 and issue me a GC? is this common?

    should I still go for the biometrics appointment or just ignore it, I'm assuming that i'd have my physical GC in had before 05/02

    ---------------------------------------------
    PD - JULY 2003 EB2 RIR
    Concurrent I-140/I-485: No (I-140 Approved Earlier)
    Mailed From State: MA
    Mailed to (state NSC/TSC): NSC
    Received at (state NSC/TSC): NSC
    Transferred to TSC (state Yes/No): Yes
    485 Receipt Date : June 14th 2007
    485 Notice Date : July 2nd 2007
    MY FP Completed : 08/02
    485 LUD - 08/02, 08/02



    more...


    makeup funny quotes to say to your quotes for your friends. quotes about your mom. quotes
  • quotes about your mom. quotes



  • delhiguy
    07-04 08:03 PM
    Excellent

    I agree with you 100 % , I believe having excessive media coverage and lawsuits , would bring the GC number and process in the open , and most americans would oppose the GC as they oppose H1B.

    If i was a american i would surely be happy with USCIS/DOS creating so much trouble for the immigrants to my country , who i believe are taking my job.

    Everyone blaming CIS/DOS needs to understand some basics behind this mess. Before going to conclude anything, first, one should read all the ombudsman reports for last 3 or 4 years. Former INS or current USCIS�s functions and operations were not questionable and not known to public till ombudsman office was established. Ombudsman has helped customers and keep helping to improve efficiency of CIS. Ombudsman main concern (or goal) have been over the 4 years are

    1. Primarily reducing backlogs in any application type particularly 485 and timely approval of any application.

    2. Abolish the need for interim benefits like EAD, AP etc. If they approve 485 in 6 months, then most of us do not require EAD and AP.

    3. Reduce the wastage of EB visas, as unused EB visas can not be carried over to next year (use it or lose it). Since 1992, about 200,000 EB visas were lost permanently. In 2003 alone, they issued only 64,000 EB visas and lost 88,000.

    The recent report to congress, the ombudsman scolded the CIS left and right for its inefficiency and highlighted how many EB visas were lost for ever, in last 10 years despite the very heavy demand for employment based green cards. Based on his report, both CIS and DOS try to obey the direction of ombudsman and modifying the 485 adjudication procedure. The reason for loss of EB visas in previous years not only due to inefficiency in processing the 485s on time, it is also due to lengthy background check delay by FBI, where USCIS has no control. For example, in 2003 they could approve about 64,000 485s only. It is partially due to USCIS inefficiency and partially due to lengthy FBI check. There are 300,000 (AOS+ Naturalization applicants) cases are pending with FBI for name check. Out of which, about 70,000 cases are pending more than 2 years. Out of 300,000 victims of name check delay, how many are really threat to the country? Perhaps none or may be few! Remember that lot of Indians also victims of name check and all the victims of name check delay already living in USA.

    The big problem is the timing when USCIS takes the visa number for a 485 applicant. Till 1982, INS took visa number for a 485 applicant as soon as they receive the application. Visa number assigned to a 485 applicant without processing his/her application. He/She may not be a qualified applicant to approve 485. Still they assign to them. If they found, the applicant is ineligible, they suppose to return the number back to DOS. However, this practice was modified after 1982. USCIS is taking visa number only at the time of approval of 485, after processing the 485 for a lengthy period. For some people, particularly victims of name check, 485 processing time vary between 2 to 5 years. Though, it is a good practice it is not the ideal or efficient process, due to name check delay. Let us assume about 150,000 are victim of name check in 2003. If they assigned all the numbers to these 150,000 applicants at the time they filed 485, the 88,000 visa numbers might have not been lost in 2003. Now what happens, those who filed 485 in 2003 (victim of name check delay) will take EB numbers from 2007 or 2008 quota, if FBI clears his/her file in 2007 or 2008. This will push back those who are going to file 485 in 2007 or 2008.

    That why, ombudsman in his 2007 yearly report to Congress recommended to practice the old way of assigning visa number to 485 applicants, to minimize the loss of visa numbers.

    Now lets come to July Visa bulletin mess.

    Because of tight holding of visa cutoff dates for EB3 and EB2 for the first 8 months of 2007 (From Oct 2006 to May 2007) USCIS approved only 66,000 485s. For the next 4 months they have about 60K to 70K numbers available. If they approve the pending 485s with slower speed or old cut off dates, there is a potential estimated loss of 40,000 EB visas by Sep 2007. Thats why, based on ombudsman recommendation, DOS moved considerably the cut off date for June. When they took inventory in May, there are about 40,000 documentarily qualified 485 applications were pending due to non-availability of visa numbers. The �documentarily qualified 485 applications� mean the application filed long time back and processed by USCIS and cleared the FBI name and criminal check, and found eligible for green card. Apart from 40,000 documentarily qualified 485 applications, there is thousands of 485 applications (documentarily not yet qualified) pending due to name check. When DOS checked with USCIS they found only 40,000 documentarily qualified 485 applications (in all EB categories put together) are pending. However, the available visas are more than 40,000 (60to 70K). Then they made with out consulting properly with USCIS they made �current� for all EB categories. This is how they determine �current� or �over-subscribed� and how they establish cutoff dates.

     If there are sufficient numbers in a particular category to satisfy all reported documentarily qualified demand, the category is considered �Current.�

     Whenever the total of documentarily qualified applicants in a category exceeds the supply of numbers available for allotment for the particular month, the category is considered to be �oversubscribed� and a visa availability cut-off date is established.

    There is nothing wrong with DOS to make all categories �current� for a July bulletin as per they definition of demand vs supply estimation to meet the numerical limitations per year. Perhaps the DOS did not aware of other impact of making all categories �current� ie fresh guys entering into I-485 race. Because of �current� there will be additional tons and tons of new filings. The rough estimation is about 500K to 700K new 485s and same amount of EAD and AP applications will be filed in July. But the available number is just 60K, and there are already 40K documentarily qualified 485s are pending more than 6 months to 3 years to take the numbers from remaining 60K pool. That leaves just 20K to fresh 485 filings. If 700K new 485 filed in July, it will choke the system. People have to live only in EAD and AP for next 5 to 10 years.

    For example, an EB3-Indian whose LC approved through fast PERM on July 30th 2007, can apply 140 and 485 on July 31st 2007 as per July visa bulletin. For his PD, it will take another 10 years for the approval of 485. During this 10 year period, he/she has to live in EAD and AP and need to go for finger print every 15 month.

    Therefore by making �current� for all EB categories is a billion dollar mistake by both DOS and CIS first part.. Another mistake is timing of rectifying mistake. USCIS and DOS and law firms should have discussed immediately about the potential chaos about making current and rectified move the cut-off to reasonable period to accommodate additional 20K 485s. If they modified the VB, with in couple of days after July 13, then there wont be a this much stress, time and wastage of money.

    There is nothing wrong in issuing additional advisory notice or modified visa bulletin to control the usage of visa numbers. The only mistake both USCIS and DOS is made is the timing of issuance of modified visa bulletin or advisory notice. It indicates poor transparency in the system and bad customer service. Now, they used all 140K visas this year. Assigning remaining 20K visa numbers to already pending 485s which are not yet documentarily (name check delayed cases) qualified is not the violation of law. It was old practice. In fact, ombudsman recommends it. They have the trump card which is Ombudsman report and recommendations. Therefore they are immune to lawsuit. Therefore, filing the law-suit is not going to help. The only two mistakes I see is 1) making all categories as �current� in June 13 and second is modifying VB only on July 2.

    My recommendation is to IV is capitalize the situation in constructive way. Law suit only bring media attention with the expense of money and time. The constructive approach is getting an immediate interim relief by legislation to recapture unused visas in previous years to balance the supply vs demand difference.





    girlfriend thinking of your friends, quotes for your friends. Inspire your friends with a
  • Inspire your friends with a



  • chmur
    03-17 05:35 PM
    The way I read it is ...People with PD's earlier than 2004-05 have been their long enough to understnd the pain and hence are active in all these forums , participate in such polls etc.

    Others are happy with their EAD's and know anyway it's going to be a while and are in hibernation ...cannot blame them ...this GC following can get stressfull ....ignorance is bliss....suddenly the laws might change or something like July 07 might happen again ....

    I think only those who got stuck in the Labor backlog (This could be huge #) and few other unlucky ones like me are the ones who are still waiting in India-EB3 Catergory pre 2004.


    I know a bunch of India-EB3 pre 2004 got approved in the gold rush of July 2007





    hairstyles funny quotes to say to your quotes for your friends. your friends Love+quotes+
  • your friends Love+quotes+



  • mbartosik
    11-27 07:50 PM
    Nrc2008065862





    GCNaseeb
    10-12 09:20 PM
    See signature





    alterego
    07-15 11:03 AM
    If your ex-employer already revoked I-140, how can he give employment verification letter now? He is saying that he is no-longer intend to employ you in the revokation , on the other hand he is giving offer letter now. It is contradictory; it will appear to CIS that you & your employer is doing fradulant practice. If the I-140 was already revoked, then there is no use from it, unless if it is revoked after 180 days of your 485 pending. If it is revoked after 180 days, you can use your new employment to port the job based on AC21 to keep the 485 valid. Otherwise forget it.

    Speak with a lawyer. Your lawyer may be able to file a response, stating that the job offer stands and that the petition was withdrawn in error. Ac21 does not protect you, so I do not see any other options here. However, as tricky as this situation is, you should not take the advise of any of the posters here. Use these responses only to have an intelligent discussion with a good immigration attorney. The worst outcome of all for you would be a rejection for fraud or willful misrepresentation, in which case your future petitions would be in jeopardy and you would be unable to retain your PD also.



    No comments:

    Post a Comment