Green.Tech
06-24 05:00 PM
Sorry for starting a thread.. Apparently somehow i missed that discussion or thread... .I am newbee here...
Thanks for the quick update.
Newbee but very active. We need more newbee's like you! Keep up the good work.
Thanks for the quick update.
Newbee but very active. We need more newbee's like you! Keep up the good work.
wallpaper Trey Songz Usher “OMG Tour”
pd_recapturing
09-11 09:56 AM
Hi, My H1B on passport is expiring in mid Jan 2008. Similarly, I-94 is also expiring same time. I applied AOS in last week of July and hoping that I will get EAD by Dec but if it does not come by then, what are my options ? If I apply H1 in first week of Jan , would that be okay as I will have expired H1B stamp and I-94 in my passport. Please advise.
GCAmigo
01-03 05:05 PM
On Sept. 14, President Bush signed the Honest Leadership and Open Government Act of 2007, an ethics and lobbying reform bill, which enforces a number of new restrictions.
Under the new law, lobbyists are prohibited from providing gifts, food, beverage and travel to Members of Congress, their staff or employees. A violation of this law could result in civil fines and/or criminal prosecution for the Company and individuals involved.
?????
Under the new law, lobbyists are prohibited from providing gifts, food, beverage and travel to Members of Congress, their staff or employees. A violation of this law could result in civil fines and/or criminal prosecution for the Company and individuals involved.
?????
2011 If I take my shirt off,
fester8542
04-08 04:29 PM
ok last one :beam:
more...
Blog Feeds
11-10 03:40 AM
AILA provided a very important update from the State Department, we wish to share with our readers.
The Department of State has issued comprehensive new policy guidance on the use of DNA testing in the visa application process. This new guidance is set forth in a new set of extensive Notes to 9 FAM 42.44.
In this new guidance, the State Department declares DNA technology to be the only acceptable non-documentary method for proving a biological relationship. The preferred specimen collection technique for DNA testing is by buccal (cheek or mouth cavity) swab.
According to the Department, DNA testing is expensive, complex and time consuming and thus should be recommended only if no other credible proof of the claimed relationship exists. Consular officers should treat DNA testing as a last resort: all other possible methods for confirming the existence of a biological relationship must be exhausted before recommending this course of action. Even then, DNA testing may only be recommended, but never required by the consular officer.
Consular officers may recommend DNA testing solely to prove a relationship; they may never recommend DNA testing in an attempt to disprove a relationship. Only DNA test results reporting a 99.5 percent or greater degree of certainty as proof of a biological relationship between a parent and child may be accepted in visa cases.
The Department clarifies that consular officers adjudicating Form I-130 Alien Relative petitions (http://www.h1b.biz/lawyer-attorney-1132137.html)are not authorized to approve the petition if DNA test results are the sole evidence of the claimed biological relationship. Such cases are not "clearly approvable" per the provisions of 9 FAM 42.41 N4.2-3; accordingly, they must be forwarded to USCIS for adjudication. Parenthetically, USCIS is authorized to approve I-130 petitions supported solely on DNA testing.
More... (http://www.visalawyerblog.com/2009/11/i130_alien_relative_petitions.html)
The Department of State has issued comprehensive new policy guidance on the use of DNA testing in the visa application process. This new guidance is set forth in a new set of extensive Notes to 9 FAM 42.44.
In this new guidance, the State Department declares DNA technology to be the only acceptable non-documentary method for proving a biological relationship. The preferred specimen collection technique for DNA testing is by buccal (cheek or mouth cavity) swab.
According to the Department, DNA testing is expensive, complex and time consuming and thus should be recommended only if no other credible proof of the claimed relationship exists. Consular officers should treat DNA testing as a last resort: all other possible methods for confirming the existence of a biological relationship must be exhausted before recommending this course of action. Even then, DNA testing may only be recommended, but never required by the consular officer.
Consular officers may recommend DNA testing solely to prove a relationship; they may never recommend DNA testing in an attempt to disprove a relationship. Only DNA test results reporting a 99.5 percent or greater degree of certainty as proof of a biological relationship between a parent and child may be accepted in visa cases.
The Department clarifies that consular officers adjudicating Form I-130 Alien Relative petitions (http://www.h1b.biz/lawyer-attorney-1132137.html)are not authorized to approve the petition if DNA test results are the sole evidence of the claimed biological relationship. Such cases are not "clearly approvable" per the provisions of 9 FAM 42.41 N4.2-3; accordingly, they must be forwarded to USCIS for adjudication. Parenthetically, USCIS is authorized to approve I-130 petitions supported solely on DNA testing.
More... (http://www.visalawyerblog.com/2009/11/i130_alien_relative_petitions.html)
kiran24
05-18 04:45 PM
My mother came for a 6 months visit on December 10th of 2010. But she left in April of 2011 (April 9th 2011), two months short of her 6 month's stay. Can she come again in August 2011 for a six month's stay, and stay till Feb 2012? Or will she have to return in 2 months? (return by October 2011)
My mother has 10 year multiple entry visa.
I heard that a visitor can stay only 6 months in a year, is it true?
If yes, is the calendar year counted from January to december?
Thanks in advance!
My mother has 10 year multiple entry visa.
I heard that a visitor can stay only 6 months in a year, is it true?
If yes, is the calendar year counted from January to december?
Thanks in advance!
more...
Rune
September 19th, 2004, 03:04 PM
I believe CMOS chips are cheaper to produce. Much more tools around to deal with CMOS chips...