lvinaykumar
04-11 05:25 PM
if that is true. then some ppl i know are in trouble. Where did you find this information....
wallpaper Nate Dogg - Discography (18
maneris
04-07 03:20 PM
What abt Medical RFEs ? Are they sent only when your dates are current ?
kanshul
05-25 08:32 AM
The important thig is the period since yoour last admission to the US before July 2007.
Say you entered in Apr 2007 then you would not have accumulated 180 days of unauthourized stay in US before filling 485 and you will be OK.
Say you entered in Apr 2007 then you would not have accumulated 180 days of unauthourized stay in US before filling 485 and you will be OK.
2011 Rip date : 2010-05-07
aries
08-29 05:35 PM
any thoughts guys....
more...
dixie
12-18 10:43 AM
Neither can I. By the way, it is notable that the Princeton event came bang in the middle of our big push in Washington during the fag end of the LD session. Wonder if any of the core members could make it to the event given how critical that particular week end was to us.
roseball
07-20 06:08 PM
First of all you would need a visa to visit UK.
I don't think Malaysian nationals residing legally in US and travelling to UK need a visitor visa...But I am not sure if UK visa law considers pending I-485 (AOS) a valid status....If you still maintain a valid H1 status but plan to re-enter on AP, you should be ok in my view...
I don't think Malaysian nationals residing legally in US and travelling to UK need a visitor visa...But I am not sure if UK visa law considers pending I-485 (AOS) a valid status....If you still maintain a valid H1 status but plan to re-enter on AP, you should be ok in my view...
more...
jaane_bhi_do_yaaro
08-06 09:00 PM
Join the donor, the fun is right in their.
Is the fun there or fun their (donors)?
:)
Is the fun there or fun their (donors)?
:)
2010 Rip.Date..: 2011-00-00
Photogenius
04-17 04:04 AM
rofl!!!!!!!! :beer: I use messenger but still, its very funny!
more...
factoryman
06-19 11:42 AM
OK. I give you the benefit of doubt. I gave 10 detailed replies on this subject.
but a search for 'skin test' gave me:
Search: Key Word(s): "skin, test" ; Forum: All other Green Card Issues and child forums
Showing results 1 to 6 of 6
Search took 0.03 seconds.
Doctor will keep x-ray. and write a report that there is no evidence of any active contagious TB infection now or in the past. Something like that. he will enclose it in the sealed cover.
Plus
advice to county to start INH regimen.
or
nothing. Go home nicely. As in my case.
but a search for 'skin test' gave me:
Search: Key Word(s): "skin, test" ; Forum: All other Green Card Issues and child forums
Showing results 1 to 6 of 6
Search took 0.03 seconds.
Doctor will keep x-ray. and write a report that there is no evidence of any active contagious TB infection now or in the past. Something like that. he will enclose it in the sealed cover.
Plus
advice to county to start INH regimen.
or
nothing. Go home nicely. As in my case.
hair RiP.DATE..: 2011-05-18
leonqiu
03-06 01:39 PM
sorry, i forget to add, i am on i-485 waiting list, and have passed 180 days
more...
boreal
08-18 02:11 PM
Bump
/\/\/\
YOu might have already tried this - pls try emailing any school association there (Indian Students Association) - that might turn up good contacts. They are a couple of good universities out there like Chapel Hill...
/\/\/\
YOu might have already tried this - pls try emailing any school association there (Indian Students Association) - that might turn up good contacts. They are a couple of good universities out there like Chapel Hill...
hot Nate Dogg-Eternal Legend
hoolahoous
02-10 10:54 AM
some retaliations (for wistleblowers) based on race, ethnicity etc. are illegal. however if it was just because they didn't agree with your behavior or business related thoughts then they are perfectly okay firing you.
saying that usually the onus is on the company to prove that it was not because of any of the protected category (race, ethnicity etc.)
-----------------------------------------
I am not a lawyer. do not take this as a legal advice.
saying that usually the onus is on the company to prove that it was not because of any of the protected category (race, ethnicity etc.)
-----------------------------------------
I am not a lawyer. do not take this as a legal advice.
more...
house RIP DATE:..Jun-26-2008
chanduv23
10-26 01:04 PM
Folks can also ask questions at the conference, but it will be moderated and limited. We will let you know the process.
tattoo Released : 2011 | EAC Rip
-2008.jpg "Rip Date: 08-31-2008")
Blog Feeds
07-16 04:50 PM
Immigration Law from Houston Immigration Lawyer - Annie Banerjee Has Just Posted the Following:
There are only 65,000 visas given for regular H-1Bs and 20,000 for holders of US Master's Degree. As of July 09, only 24,800 regular petitions were filed and 10,600 US Master's petition were filed. The reason for this slow filing is two fold.
Heading into a deeper recession, the economy is definitely a factor. Unlike what most people think, Companies would rather hire US workers, and not pay the $2320/- filing fees plus attorney's fees.
However there are some professions which have a shortage in the US. That is true of computer professionals. But the computer professional market has been bruised by a poorly conceived and legally impermissible memo that CIS promulgated on January 08, 2010. The CIS is their infinite wisdom deemed that professionals need to be "controlled" directly by the petitioning company.
The IT business typically have contracts that go through tiers--- from the petitioning company to the end user. The CIS thinks that this creates "job shop" a four letter word to them.
The Jan 08 memo is startling in how unconstitutional it is---- how it totally disregards the rule of law. The class action lawsuit against it will hopefully see the end of the memo. Meanwhile software companies are outsourcing their business elsewhere.
However if there is a contract using an intermediary, control can be shown if another employee of the same H-1B employer works for the end user and actually supervises the H-1B beneficiary.
For instance if Company A, the H-1B employer has a contract with Company F and Company F has a contract with the end user, Company Bigshot. If Company A has employee X who works for Big Shot too, who supervises employee Y, who is the beneficiary, then control can be established under the January 08 memo. Of course all companies have to provide a ton of document to prove the case.
For more information contact Houston Immigration Lawyer (http://www.visatous.com) or Houston Immigration Attorney (http://www.visatous.com), Annie Banerjeehttps://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/8629098317507537197-5047952532017099820?l=usimmigrationmatters.blogspo t.com
More... (http://usimmigrationmatters.blogspot.com/2010/07/how-to-how-to-show-control-under-jan-08.html)
There are only 65,000 visas given for regular H-1Bs and 20,000 for holders of US Master's Degree. As of July 09, only 24,800 regular petitions were filed and 10,600 US Master's petition were filed. The reason for this slow filing is two fold.
Heading into a deeper recession, the economy is definitely a factor. Unlike what most people think, Companies would rather hire US workers, and not pay the $2320/- filing fees plus attorney's fees.
However there are some professions which have a shortage in the US. That is true of computer professionals. But the computer professional market has been bruised by a poorly conceived and legally impermissible memo that CIS promulgated on January 08, 2010. The CIS is their infinite wisdom deemed that professionals need to be "controlled" directly by the petitioning company.
The IT business typically have contracts that go through tiers--- from the petitioning company to the end user. The CIS thinks that this creates "job shop" a four letter word to them.
The Jan 08 memo is startling in how unconstitutional it is---- how it totally disregards the rule of law. The class action lawsuit against it will hopefully see the end of the memo. Meanwhile software companies are outsourcing their business elsewhere.
However if there is a contract using an intermediary, control can be shown if another employee of the same H-1B employer works for the end user and actually supervises the H-1B beneficiary.
For instance if Company A, the H-1B employer has a contract with Company F and Company F has a contract with the end user, Company Bigshot. If Company A has employee X who works for Big Shot too, who supervises employee Y, who is the beneficiary, then control can be established under the January 08 memo. Of course all companies have to provide a ton of document to prove the case.
For more information contact Houston Immigration Lawyer (http://www.visatous.com) or Houston Immigration Attorney (http://www.visatous.com), Annie Banerjeehttps://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/8629098317507537197-5047952532017099820?l=usimmigrationmatters.blogspo t.com
More... (http://usimmigrationmatters.blogspot.com/2010/07/how-to-how-to-show-control-under-jan-08.html)
more...
pictures RiP DATE: 2009-01-23
raghaone
07-17 11:13 PM
Dear friends,
Please be careful of corrupt attorneys and employers selling same labor to multiple candidates and making money by filing concurrent cases. I am happy that the substitution labor is dead which kills corruption by employers and attorneys. This is one of my bitter experiences with substitute labor.
Please be careful of corrupt attorneys and employers selling same labor to multiple candidates and making money by filing concurrent cases. I am happy that the substitution labor is dead which kills corruption by employers and attorneys. This is one of my bitter experiences with substitute labor.
dresses Rip type: unmixed, by tracks
Jaime
09-15 12:18 PM
你好 - 华盛顿!
more...
makeup EAC Rip | FLAC (tracks + cue +
gcdreamer05
11-24 04:19 PM
We filed our 485 on July 2nd 2007 at Nebraska office � EB3 � July 7, 2001
- The case was shifted to Texas and we received notices from Texas office with receipt date of August 27.
- Our date is now current however processing at Texas is still stuck at June 27, 2007.
- Does this mean our RD is now 08/27/07 even though it was recd. at Nebraska on 07/02/07??
Unfortunately yes - RD Aug 27, you can confirm this by looking at your receipt notice that you got from your attorney.
- The case was shifted to Texas and we received notices from Texas office with receipt date of August 27.
- Our date is now current however processing at Texas is still stuck at June 27, 2007.
- Does this mean our RD is now 08/27/07 even though it was recd. at Nebraska on 07/02/07??
Unfortunately yes - RD Aug 27, you can confirm this by looking at your receipt notice that you got from your attorney.
girlfriend Rip Date: 08-31-2008
avantika.nandamuri
04-07 07:04 PM
I have valid H1 visa with Company A till sep 2009. I have applied for h1 transfer to company B in june 2008 and it's still pending without any RFE. I got an offer from Company C. Can I transfer my H1 to company C, when H1 transfer with company B is pending? Company A has revoked my H1. will that in any way affect my h1 transfer??
hairstyles Nate Dogg,Snoop Dogg - Im Fly
sbmallik
05-07 11:08 AM
And how does consular processing help? Can I enter US before getting a GC in this case?
Consular Processing allows the beneficiary to remain abroad till the GC is approved at a consulate. At all times the petitioner should show intent to hire you for the future job. If you need to enter US earlier, it's your job to arrange an alternate visa.
Consular Processing allows the beneficiary to remain abroad till the GC is approved at a consulate. At all times the petitioner should show intent to hire you for the future job. If you need to enter US earlier, it's your job to arrange an alternate visa.
joolie1
02-07 05:52 PM
I happened to look at my EAD today, when I was looking into what my next steps are for my marriage immigration process, and I noticed it expired long before my Permanent Resident Card. Erroneously I thought the two were tied together, since I applied for both under the same auspices. Now I am very worried. 1) I have been employed the whole time and 2) I cannot afford to be unemployed. What do I do?
learning01
04-06 01:33 PM
bill (# S......), will come into this S.Amdt of Specter. See my post here elsewhere in IV (http://immigrationvoice.org/forum/showpost.php?p=7032&postcount=177).
Everyone these are the provisions in the original Hagel bill. We're not sure whether they will be there in the new one or not.
Everyone these are the provisions in the original Hagel bill. We're not sure whether they will be there in the new one or not.
No comments:
Post a Comment